Baptist News Global
Sections
  • News
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Curated
  • Podcasts
    • Stuck in the Middle With You ↗
    • Madang with Grace Ji-Sun Kim ↗
    • Highest Power: Church + State ↗
    • Non-Disclosure: The Silenced Stories of Kanakuk Kamps Survivors ↗
    • Change-making Conversations ↗
  • Storytelling
    • Faith & Justice >
      • Charleston: Metanoia with Bill Stanfield
      • Charlotte: QC Family Tree with Greg and Helms Jarrell
      • Little Rock: Judge Wendell Griffen
      • North Carolina: Conetoe
    • Welcoming the Stranger >
      • Lost Boys of Sudan: St. John’s Baptist Charlotte
      • Awakening to Immigrant Justice: Myers Park Baptist Church
      • Hospitality on the corner: Gaston Christian Center
    • Signature Ministries >
      • Jake Hall: Gospel Gothic, Music and Radio
    • Singing Our Faith >
      • Hymns for a Lifetime: Ken Wilson and Knollwood Baptist Church
      • Norfolk Street Choir
    • Resilient Rural America >
      • Alabama: Perry County
      • Texas: Hidalgo County
      • Arkansas Delta
      • Southeast Kentucky
  • More
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donate
    • Associated Baptist Press Foundation
    • Planned Giving
    • Advertising
    • Ministry Jobs
    • Subscribe
    • Submissions and Permissions
Donate Subscribe
Search Search this site

Okla. Supreme Court upholds school vouchers

NewsBob Allen  |  February 17, 2016

The Oklahoma Supreme Court has upheld a program that sends scholarships to parents of students with disabilities for use at private schools, including religious schools, rejecting claims it violates a provision in the state constitution barring taxpayer aid to religion.

The Oklahoma Supreme Court ruled Feb. 16 that a school voucher program for students with disabilities is constitutional, over objections that it amounts to indirect taxpayer funding of parochial schools.

The state high court said the Lindsey Nicole Henry Scholarships for Students with Disabilities Program does not violate a ban in the state constitution on direct or indirect use of public funds for religious organizations because parents, not the government, determine where to send their children to school.
Lindsey_Nicole_HenryScholar_bannerThe court rejected arguments that because the vast majority of private schools qualified to accept the scholarships are religious, the program is tantamount to state support and control of religion, thereby violating an article in the Oklahoma constitution stating: “No public money or property shall ever be appropriated, applied, donated, or used, directly or indirectly, for the use, benefit, or support of any sect, church, denomination, or system of religion, or for the use, benefit, or support of any priest, preacher, minister, or other religious teacher or dignitary, or sectarian institution as such.”

A friend-of-the-court brief by Americans United for Separation of Church and State, the American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU of Oklahoma, Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty and The Interfaith Alliance Foundation argued unsuccessfully that the intent of Oklahoma’s “no-aid” clause was historical attempts to use federal money to pressure Native American parents to enroll their children in Christian schools. That effort was an attempt to assimilate, by converting to Christianity, a population relocated during the Trail of Tears death march following the Indian Removal Act of 1830.

Other groups including the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty argued the real agenda behind the Oklahoma law and similar laws passed in other states was failure in 1875 of an amendment to the U.S. Constitution proposed by Republican Congressman James G. Blaine from Maine prohibiting the use of public funds by any religious school.

A Beckett Fund brief said state Blaine amendments had their genesis “in anti-Catholic bigotry of the mid-19th century” and represent a shameful chapter in American history that needs to be repudiated.

The justices didn’t address the amendment’s history but said they were unconvinced that there is constitutional significance to the fact that more students receiving the scholarships attend sectarian private schools than schools that are non-sectarian.

The high court was persuaded by the fact that scholarship funds “are paid to the parent or legal guardian and not to the private school.” It is the parent “who then directs payment by endorsement to the independently chosen private school,” the court said, without any control or direction of the state, breaking “the circuit between government and religion.”

“Because the parent receives and directs the funds to the private school, sectarian or non-sectarian, we are satisfied that the State is not actively involved in the adoption of sectarian principles or directing monetary support to a sectarian institution through this scholarship,” the Supreme Court opinion stated.

“When the scholarship payment is directed to a sectarian private school it is at the sole and independent choice and direction of the parent and not the State,” the court explained. “The scholarship funded through the Act has no bearing on state control of churches. We are convinced that the scholarships funded by the Act have no adverse impact on the ability of churches to act independently of state control and to operate separately from the state.”

The scholarships, authorized by a state law passed in 2010, are named after Lindsey Nicole Henry, infant daughter of former Gov. Brad Henry, who died in 1990 from spinal muscular atrophy.

Previous story:

Brief asks Okla. Supreme Court to strike down school voucher program

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • More
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
Tags:Church State Separation
More by
Bob Allen
  • Get BNG headlines in your inbox

  • Check out our podcasts

     

     

    Stuck in the Middle
    With You

     

    Madang
    With Grace Ji-Sun Kim

     

     

    Highest Power
    Church+State

     

     

    Non-Disclosure:
    The Silenced Stories
    of Kanakuk Kamps Survivors

     

    Change-making
    Conversations

     

     

  • Politics • Faith • Resistance: by Greg Garrett

    BNG interview series on the state of faith, politics and resistance in our nation.

    See also Greg’s series on Politics, Faith and Mission

     

  • Featured

    • Islamophobia is the next bogeyman

      Opinion

    • The Black Church cannot remain America’s emergency moral infrastructure

      Opinion

    • We are manna

      Opinion

    • Webinar explores religious context of America’s Founders

      News


    Curated

    • Staunch Israel critic and Gaza trauma surgeon Adam Hamawy wins NJ-12 primary

      Staunch Israel critic and Gaza trauma surgeon Adam Hamawy wins NJ-12 primary

    • Elderly Christian Among 31 Sentenced In China Church Crackdown

      Elderly Christian Among 31 Sentenced In China Church Crackdown

    • In U.F.O. Files, Some Christians See Vexing Questions — and Demons

      In U.F.O. Files, Some Christians See Vexing Questions — and Demons

    • Christian theologians react to the pope’s ai warning

      Christian theologians react to the pope’s ai warning

    Conversations that Matter.

    © 2026 Baptist News Global. All rights reserved.

    Want to share a story? We hope you will! Read our republishing, terms of use and privacy policies here.

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • LinkedIn
    • RSS
    • 129