Despite forced letter from Trump, agencies distributing USDA food boxes
Millions of boxes of USDA surplus food are being shipped with mandated letters from President Donald Trump asserting his concern to protect the well-being of Americans struggling through the coronavirus pandemic — including recommendations for wearing masks and practicing social distancing.
That this unprecedented action is happening just in time for the November election is a fact that critics decry as a cheap politicization of food and hunger.
Yet, faith-based and secular food providers say they are distributing the boxes, regardless, because hungry people need food.
“I don’t like the fact there are letters in there with his name on it, but it’s not going to stop me from delivering that food,” said Jason Coker, national director of Together for Hope, the rural development coalition of the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship.
The $4 billion Coronavirus Food Assistance Program — also known as Farmers to Family Food Boxes — was launched in April in response to huge food scarcity increases due to the pandemic. Since then, 102 million boxes have been distributed, according to the USDA.
The boxes include fresh meat, dairy and produce and, for the past couple of weeks, a letter from Trump, in English and Spanish, claiming his direct involvement in making the program happen.
“Over the last four weeks, we have delivered 50 million (boxes) to American families, and we will continue to serve those most in need during this challenging time,” the letter states.
But the letter’s presence is a challenge to some of those who distribute the boxes, said Robin Safley, executive director of Feeding Florida, the state’s food bank network and a Feeding America member organization.
“We have already gotten some feedback from people who were offended by the letter and pushed back on the food bank because they don’t know the intricacies of how the box works,” she said. “We are serving thousands and thousands of individuals, and the letter is a requirement.”
In fact, the boxes arrive at food pantries with the letter already inside. “Even if you could remove it, it would be highly labor intensive and raise food safety issues,” she said.
Several food banks in Florida have responded by adding their own letters to the boxes or using social media to distance themselves from the Trump letter. “There is a lot of nervousness about the letter,” she said.
But none of the food banks in Safley’s network have decided against distributing the boxes.
“As a network, there is some angst about it, but nobody in Florida thought they could reject the food because hunger and the needs of people come before that.”
Still, the nagging concern about politicizing food and hunger remains strong, Safley added. “Food and hunger should be nonpartisan.”
But such problems come with the territory when cooperating with government in distributing food to those in need.
“Yes, the recent food boxes Three Square received from the USDA did contain the letter from President Trump inside,” said Brian Burton, president and CEO of Three Square Food Bank in Las Vegas, Nev. “The nonprofit appreciates the support of Congress and the White House. And, while Three Square believes that hunger is a non-partisan issue, solutions to fight hunger require collaboration. These points are mentioned in a supplemental letter that Three Square penned to be included with the boxes as well.”
Coker said the presence of a presidential letter in the food boxes would be easier to swallow if it were from a president who had demonstrated sympathy or concern for the working poor of America.
“What is wrong with our system that we have to be in the food business at all?
However, “The bottom line is people are getting food.”
And there are systemic factors around hunger that deserve more attention, he added.
“Why is it so bad in America that we have to do that much charity work? What is wrong with our system that we have to be in the food business at all? If we’re as great as we think we are as a country, why are so many people food insecure?” Coker asked. “The answer is that the policies we create in this country aren’t broken — they’re designed to work this way.”