By Greg Warner
Associated Baptist Press
Some moderate Baptists in North Carolina are talking seriously about alternative ways to support the state’s Baptist colleges and institutions, a move that could divert millions in contributions from the conservative-controlled Baptist State Convention of North Carolina.
Interested moderates and representatives from virtually all of the convention’s institutions met privately Dec. 1 to discuss alternatives for the future, now that conservatives have solidified control of the convention and indicated they will install sympathetic trustees and leaders for the institutions.
No plan was announced at the meeting, hosted by St. John’s Baptist Church in Charlotte, but participants said there is more momentum for action than ever before—with some predicting a major shift in funds from the state convention by 2007.
Participants agreed to form a committee to explore options, but no one was ready to predict if the outcome will be a simple network of churches, an alternative budget, or—least likely—a “shadow” convention.
Some North Carolina moderates have talked about breaking away from the state Baptist convention for at least four years but have feared their beloved colleges would suffer financially. Leaders said this was the first time all the agencies participated in a conversation about alternate methods of financial support.
North Carolina Baptists support five colleges, as well as a newspaper, children’s homes, retirement homes, a hospital and a foundation. The colleges receive $6.1 million from the convention. But lumped with funds for the other agencies—as well as mission offerings and other sources—the BSCNC controls about $16 million that benefits institutions and other mission causes in the state, the leaders were told Dec. 1.
The meeting’s objective, according to participants, was to make sure moderate and progressive Baptists have a way to support the institutions they like—particularly colleges—without funding the state convention, which they say has increasingly excluded them and their views.
“If the colleges and institutions presently affiliated with the North Carolina Baptist Convention opted to realign themselves denominationally, and if many Baptist churches throughout our state are contemplating a similar move, would it not be possible for all of us to realign together?” asked Richard Kremer, pastor of St. John’s Baptist, in a letter inviting sympathetic leaders to the Dec. 1 meeting.
During the meeting, however, representatives from some institutions expressed discomfort with the terminology of “denominational realignment,” preferring the term “change in relationship.” Others said they do not anticipate any change in their relationship with the convention, according to one participant.
Most of the North Carolina agencies are led by moderates, or by conservatives not aligned with the convention’s power structure. Moderates say their past contributions played a major role in building the institutions. But the convention’s power structure is clearly in the hands of conservatives, who have won a string of elections by a widening margin.
Kremer declined to name the participants or discuss the content of the Charlotte meeting. “We agreed at the beginning this would be an off-the-record meeting,” he told Associated Baptist Press. “We just needed a level of honesty.”
That was achieved, Kremer said. “We achieved a level of honesty in the last couple hours of that meeting that I had not witnessed in 14 years in this state,” he said. He declined to predict the outcome of the talks, except to say, “North Carolina churches and colleges are all examining the nature of their relationships.”
He said more significant gatherings, with more substantive results, will follow now that churches and the agencies are walking together.
The key to the new resolve, other participants said, is for the colleges to act in unison. In other states, Baptist colleges have parted ways as conservatives have come to power. Some have courted the favor of conservative leaders, forging closer ties, while others—Furman, Mercer, Belmont, Baylor, Wake Forest, Stetson—have fought for greater independence.
The five colleges still related to the North Carolina convention—Campbell University, Chowan College, Gardner-Webb University, Mars Hill College and Wingate University—recently asked for a formal study of their relationships with the convention (Wake Forest University and Meredith College already have broken away). The study, overseen by a specially appointed committee, is expected to report by August 2006.
Moderates are expected to wait for the outcome of the study, and to see if it is accepted by the convention, before taking radical steps. If the colleges are freed to elect their own trustees and can still get some convention funding for scholarships, then a continued relationship with the convention is possible, leaders say. But most moderates suggest that’s not likely.
If the colleges break away, some moderate churches would shift their giving patterns to help make up for the colleges‚ potential loss of $6 million in convention funding. That might create a “slipstream,” one participant said, that could lead to changes impacting other institutions, as well.
Until now, most moderates in North Carolina have been content to channel their money for institutions through the state convention, which offers four budget options with varying support for conservative and moderate causes.
But attempts to eliminate those options and to limit support only to Southern Baptist-approved causes have become a regular occurrence at the state’s annual convention meeting and are now viewed by both sides as inevitable.
Conservatives, who some believe have a goal of “cleaning up” their denominational house before the Southern Baptist Convention meets in Greensboro in June, did achieve other objectives during the Nov. 14-16 state convention—electing their candidate as president, toughening the convention’s stance against gay-friendly churches, and approving new institutional trustees despite complaints that the process unfairly excluded some candidates.
A search committee is currently looking for a new executive director for the convention, and conservatives promise to replace former executive director Jim Royston—viewed by many as sympathetic to moderates—with a clear-cut conservative.
Larry Hovis, coordinator of the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship of North Carolina, said moderates in North Carolina could turn to the state CBF as the alternative structure to support the institutions. With a funding channel already in place that supports North Carolina causes, he said, “there’s nothing [under consideration] that can’t be accomplished” through the North Carolina CBF, which is an affiliate of the national CBF.
Hovis said his group has a $660,000 annual budget and that 318 Baptist churches in North Carolina fund either the state or national CBF.
But others said the state CBF won't be enough. There are many moderate and middle-of-the-road churches not ready to align with the Fellowship, otherwise they would have done so by now, one agency leader said. The point of the Dec. 1 meeting was to meet the needs of those churches, he said. "We need some channel where they can do this."
Although support for North Carolina Baptist institutions remains strong, most observers agree there's no energy for starting another convention —as has been done by moderates in Missouri and conservatives in Texas and Virginia.