Baptist News Global
Sections
  • News
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Curated
  • Podcasts
    • Stuck in the Middle With You ↗
    • Madang with Grace Ji-Sun Kim ↗
    • Highest Power: Church + State ↗
    • Non-Disclosure: The Silenced Stories of Kanakuk Kamps Survivors ↗
    • Change-making Conversations ↗
  • Storytelling
    • Faith & Justice >
      • Charleston: Metanoia with Bill Stanfield
      • Charlotte: QC Family Tree with Greg and Helms Jarrell
      • Little Rock: Judge Wendell Griffen
      • North Carolina: Conetoe
    • Welcoming the Stranger >
      • Lost Boys of Sudan: St. John’s Baptist Charlotte
      • Awakening to Immigrant Justice: Myers Park Baptist Church
      • Hospitality on the corner: Gaston Christian Center
    • Signature Ministries >
      • Jake Hall: Gospel Gothic, Music and Radio
    • Singing Our Faith >
      • Hymns for a Lifetime: Ken Wilson and Knollwood Baptist Church
      • Norfolk Street Choir
    • Resilient Rural America >
      • Alabama: Perry County
      • Texas: Hidalgo County
      • Arkansas Delta
      • Southeast Kentucky
  • More
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donate
    • Associated Baptist Press Foundation
    • Planned Giving
    • Advertising
    • Ministry Jobs
    • Subscribe
    • Submissions and Permissions
Donate Subscribe
Search Search this site

Stem-cell déjà vu as Senate re-passes while Bush promises repeat veto

NewsABPnews  |  April 12, 2007

WASHINGTON (ABP) — About the only thing that hasn't been cloned in Washington's debate on embryonic stem cells is the embryos themselves.

The Senate, in a repeat performance April 11, passed the “Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2007” (S. 5) by a wide — but not veto-proof — majority. It was the second time in a year the chamber had approved such a bill.

In January, the House passed its version of the same bill, just as it had a year before.

And, just as before, President Bush vowed to veto the latest bill. The only other time he has used his veto power came last year when he axed the previously passed version of the bill.

In the Senate's latest action, 19 Republicans joined 44 Democrats in voting for the proposal. The 63 votes were identical to the margin the previous bill received in the Senate.

The 34 voting against the bill included two Democrats.

The proposal would greatly expand the government's ability to fund embryonic stem-cell research. Biologists prize the cells because they can replicate themselves and have the potential to grow into almost any kind of human tissue. Therefore, they may one day be used to replace cells destroyed by diseases — such as Parkinson's — that are currently deadly.

Most conservative religious and anti-abortion groups oppose such research because embryos are destroyed in the process of extracting their stem cells. In one of his first acts after he took office in 2001, Bush issued an executive order severely limiting federal funding for such research.

The latest bill — as the previous one — would have overturned Bush's limits on embryonic stem-cell research.

“Today, as hundreds of millions of Americans wait for progress, our scientists, our innovators, are marking time waiting for President Bush to keep hope alive. The wishes of the American people and the overwhelming weight of evidence — scientific evidence — should trump the narrow ideology of President George Bush,” said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) as he introduced the bill on the Senate floor.

But, in a statement promising a repeat veto, Bush defended his policy as maintaining bioethical standards in a new and perilous area of scientific inquiry. “While encouraging — not banning — research, my policy also ensures that federal funds are not used to create incentives to destroy or harm or create living human embryos for purposes of research,” he said.

Congress' latest move to undo his executive order “will encourage taxpayer money to be spent on the destruction or endangerment of living human embryos — raising serious moral concerns for millions of Americans,” Bush said.

Much of the mainstream biological community has opposed Bush's policy. Last month, Bush's own director of the National Institutes of Health, Elias Zerhouni, undermined the Bush policy in testimony before a Senate committee. Zerhouni said “it is in the best interests of our scientists, our science and our country that we find ways and the nation finds a way to go full-speed across adult and embryonic stem cells equally.”

While pro-life groups claim that embryonic stem-cell research is tantamount to abortion, many senators who otherwise oppose abortion rights — such as Reid and Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) voted for the bill.

Senators also passed a competing bill, sponsored by Republicans Norm Coleman (Minn.) and Johnny Isakson (Ga.), that would keep Bush's standards in place but also expand other forms of stem-cell research. The HOPE Act would open federal funding for research on what it calls “naturally dead embryos.” However, some biologists have said that is not a medical definition and that such research does not provide the same potential as other embryonic stem-cell research.

Reid, in introducing the main bill, said he would not vote for the HOPE Act because it is a “cover vote” to appease the public — the vast majority of whom favor stem-cell research — while not angering religious conservatives. “The legislation is, in my opinion, more political than substantive, more political than scientific,” Reid said.

The HOPE Act is S. 30.

The House-passed version of the main bill is H.R. 3. It now goes to a House-Senate conference committee before being forwarded to Bush.

-30-

Read more:

House passes stem-cell bill again, sets up new showdown (1/12/2007)

Bush uses first veto in office on popular stem-cell bill (7/19/2006)

House approves stem-cell bill despite Bush's veto threat (5/25/2005)

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • More
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
Tags:Archives
More by
ABPnews
  • Get BNG headlines in your inbox

  • Check out our podcasts

     

     

    Stuck in the Middle
    With You

     

    Madang
    With Grace Ji-Sun Kim

     

     

    Highest Power
    Church+State

     

     

    Non-Disclosure:
    The Silenced Stories
    of Kanakuk Kamps Survivors

     

    Change-making
    Conversations

     

     

  • Politics • Faith • Resistance: by Greg Garrett

    BNG interview series on the state of faith, politics and resistance in our nation.

    See also Greg’s series on Politics, Faith and Mission

     

  • Featured

    • Understanding Al Mohler’s case against women

      Analysis

    • BNG podcasts feature each SBC presidential candidate

      Opinion

    • What the church got wrong about queer people

      Opinion

    • Trump admin denies hunger strike at immigrant detention center

      News


    Curated

    • Why Mary, as the Immaculate Conception, became the patron saint of the US in the 1840s

      Why Mary, as the Immaculate Conception, became the patron saint of the US in the 1840s

    • ICE protesters who interrupted Minnesota church service won’t face state charges, prosecutor says

      ICE protesters who interrupted Minnesota church service won’t face state charges, prosecutor says

    • Raising Dementia Awareness, One Black Church at a Time

      Raising Dementia Awareness, One Black Church at a Time

    • Trump Pledges $100M To Cuba, But Only If Faith‑Based Groups Distribute It

      Trump Pledges $100M To Cuba, But Only If Faith‑Based Groups Distribute It

    Conversations that Matter.

    © 2026 Baptist News Global. All rights reserved.

    Want to share a story? We hope you will! Read our republishing, terms of use and privacy policies here.

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • LinkedIn
    • RSS
    • 129