(ABP) — Can Calvinist and non-Calvinist Baptists work and worship together?
It depends, some advocates of Reformed theology say, on whether Christians on both sides are willing to tiptoe through the TULIP — the acronym for five doctrinal specifics that mark Calvinism — without stomping on anyone’s flower bed.
TULIP stands for total depravity, unconditional election, limited atonement, irresistible grace and perseverance of the saints. Those five doctrines, delineated by the Synod of Dort in the 17th century, summarize distinctive elements of the theological system taught by reformer John Calvin — particularly as distinguished from the teachings of James Jacobus Arminius, who emphasized free will over determinism.
Proponents of what often is called “five-point Calvinism” emphasize the absolute sovereignty of God, typified by the doctrine of predestination. Predestination holds that God ordains a specific and finite number of human beings to be saved — on the basis of his good pleasure alone.
Historically, Baptists have come down on both sides of Calvinism’s fence. Many prominent Baptist figures have identified themselves as Calvinists, including 19th century British pastor and evangelist Charles Haddon Spurgeon and James Petigru Boyce, founding president of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary.
On the other hand, the fathers of the Baptist movement — Englishmen John Smyth and Thomas Helwys — rejected Calvinism.
Calvin’s cool on campus
After a long period of disfavor, however, full five-point Calvinism is gaining in popularity in some Baptist circles today. A study by two Southern Baptist Convention agencies — the North American Mission Board and LifeWay Christian Resources — showed that about 30 percent of recent graduates of Southern Baptist seminaries identify themselves as Calvinists. That figure compares to 10 percent of Southern Baptist pastors overall.
Renewed interest in Reformed theology — what Calvinists refer to as “the doctrines of grace” — also is evident among university students, some Baptist college professors have noted. In part, observers attribute the growth of Calvinism on college campuses to the popularity of the Passion worship event-conferences, which feature prominent Calvinists like Baptist pastor-theologian John Piper.
The Passion movement and related One Day events serve as gateways into Calvinism, said Roger Olson, professor of theology at Baylor University’s George W. Truett Theological Seminary.
“My experience is that many young Christians swept up by this wave know little about the details of this kind of Calvinism,” Olson said. “Many of them are simply shocked to find out that it entails belief in limited atonement” — the belief that Christ’s sacrificial death only atones for a percentage of humankind rather than its entirety.
Olson continued, “However, after a while, many of them gradually accept it lock, stock and barrel because they don’t know any alternative. Southern Baptists — and offshoots — have not been very good at offering young people sound theology.”
Hunger for theology that is “rigorously biblical and satisfies the desire to hear from God in his Word” accounts for much of Calvinism’s popularity among students, said Thomas Ascol. He is the executive director of Founders Ministries, an organization that promotes Reformed theology in Southern Baptist life.
“The rising generation is looking for authenticity,” Ascol said. Students read biblical stories about faithful people who suffered martyrdom, and they hunger for “the radicalness of biblical Christianity,” he noted.
“Then they look at the slick and oftentimes superficial Christianity that dominates American evangelicalism, and they wonder why there is a difference. What did those early believers see [that] we don’t see? Part of the answer is they saw the majestic supremacy of God over every sphere of life.”
Dancing to Piper’s tune?
To Reformed theology’s Baptist advocates, Piper is, literally, a Godsend. Ascol said the pastor — who leads a Minneapolis church affiliated with the Baptist General Conference — has been used to “cast a vision of radically biblical Christianity” to a new generation.
“There is no fluff in Piper’s ministry. It is rock-solid Bible teaching that does not shy away from the hard sayings and clear calls of discipleship,” he said. “It is authentic in its devotion to the text of Scripture. That resonates with many in the younger generation who are hungry for truth.”
But critics of resurgent Calvinism see popular Reformed theology as appealing to the desire for clear-cut, black-and-white answers.
“The present, new Calvinists claim to know way, way too much about the mind of God,” Olson asserted.
The Baylor professor drew a distinction between the gentle and nuanced Calvinism held by many Christians in historically Reformed churches — such as the Presbyterian tradition — and the assertive new form.
“My experience is that this new wave of Reformed theology — inspired by John Piper who is inspired by Jonathan Edwards — appeals mostly to young men who want to avoid any hint of ambiguity in their theology,” he said.
Doctrine that divides
In part because its adherents hold to its teachings so tenaciously, Calvinism has divided some congregations — particularly when Calvinist pastors have asserted their beliefs in historically non-Calvinist churches.
Such division, some Calvinists say, may be inevitable.
“Any given doctrine will divide. The gospel itself is a doctrine that divides,” said Jonathan Leeman, director of communications for 9Marks, a ministry founded by Reformed Southern Baptist pastor Mark Dever.
“There has been a renewed emphasis on the doctrines of grace, and that could lead to some level of divisiveness. That’s almost necessarily so, in the same way that an emphasis on [biblical] inerrancy led to division within the Southern Baptist Convention.”
In fact, Leeman said, he believes no one should be surprised by the growing interest in Calvinism among Southern Baptists.
“The inerrancy debate brought a renewed interest in the careful study of the Scriptures, and that brings with it a more careful enunciation of doctrine,” he said.
But some Calvinists believe they have been unjustly tagged with the divisiveness label.
“What I have discovered is that Calvinism is blamed far more often for dividing churches or associations than is actually the case,” Ascol said. “Closer investigation has often revealed that Calvinism is often the tail on which the donkey is pinned. I know of more cases where the real issue behind a controversy is biblical Christianity — what is a Christian and how does a person become one — not Calvinism.”
Missions and evangelism
Ascol also believes Calvinists often have been unfairly stereotyped as anti-missionary.
“Look at who has been going as [Southern Baptist] career missionaries over the last few years. A significant percentage would classify themselves as Reformed,” he said.
He also pointed to historic Calvinists known for their evangelistic and missionary zeal — George Whitefield, Andrew Fuller, William Carey and George Muller, as well as Edwards and Spurgeon.
Olson acknowledged the current wave of Baptist Calvinism — which he calls “Piperism” — is characterized by a fervent missionary spirit.
“However, I think those who follow it out to its logical conclusion may eventually decide that there is no point in evangelism or missions,” he said. “That has certainly happened in the past with this kind of Calvinism. If you are told that your evangelism and missionary work is nothing more than a ‘foreordained means to a foreordained end,’ and it cannot alter what God has already decided, you might conclude that there is no urgency.”
But Leeman said that problem is solved by framing the evangelistic impetus in terms familiar to most evangelicals, whether Calvinist or non-Calvinist — love and obedience.
“Being that Christ is my greatest love, I will want to share him with others,” he said, adding that Jesus commanded his followers to share the gospel. “The call to repentance and obedience is not optional.”
But concern about Calvinism’s impact on fulfilling Christ’s Great Commission is a valid concern, even if it’s not well founded, Leeman added.
“The primary cause of division over the issue [of Calvinism] is concern on the part of the non-Reformed crowd that it will hurt evangelism and missions, and those of us who are Reformed need to be entirely sympathetic to that concern,” he said.
“At the same time, instead of debating issues with us, I would like to see the non-Reformed crowd give us the benefit of the doubt. Accept that a Reformed congregation means what it says when it affirms evangelism and missions.”
Show some grace
Ironically, the debate over the doctrines of grace often has been characterized by a lack of grace by those on both sides. Much of the division caused by Calvinism could be avoided if Christians treated each other a bit more graciously, some Calvinists and non-Calvinists agreed.
“I love my Calvinist friends and students,” Olson said. “I have no quarrel with them; it is only with their theology I have a quarrel. And I do not attempt to convert my Calvinist students to non-Calvinism. I only ask them to study all the options and make sure they are thinking biblically and logically.”
In local congregations, Ascol said, shared belief about Jesus Christ and biblical authority should be sufficient ground for both sides to share the same pews peacefully.
“Our church has Calvinists and non-Calvinists joyfully laboring together for the gospel, and I know of many other churches that do, too,” he said.
“We do that by focusing on the gospel — who Jesus is, what he has done and why that matters. We may not agree on every detail of how the gospel works … but we are all committed to the Lordship of Jesus Christ and his supremacy over all of life. Where there is a pre-commitment to the authority of God’s written Word and a confessional and covenantal agreement [about] how we will live together, there can and should be genuine unity in Christ.”
-30-
Read more:
Baptist Boomer theologians show fondness for Calvinism (4/29)