By Jim Denison
Who would have imagined a month ago that Hosni Mubarak would be displaced by a pro-democracy movement fueled by social media? Or that activists would oust the dictator of Tunisia, force the leader of Jordan to replace his government and fill the streets of Tehran and Tripoli with demonstrators? How did this unprecedented uprising in the Arab world begin? What is its relevance to the rest of the world? What is its spiritual significance?
In 2005, a group in Egypt organized “Youth for Change,” but many tried working through established parties without success. In 2008 the group attempted to organize isolated labor strikes, but bad weather and police crackdowns defeated their efforts. A year ago, their movement gained a strategic ally when Wael Ghonim, the now-famous Google marketing executive, joined their ranks.
He set up a Facebook group named for Khalid Said, the young Egyptian who was beaten to death by police last year. His page attracted hundreds of thousands of followers. They focused on Jan. 25, which is Police Day in Egypt (a holiday which celebrates a police revolt suppressed by the British in 1952). More than 100,000 signed up to join their protest, and the rest is history.
Their movement illustrates the power of social media. In the current edition of Foreign Affairs, Clay Shirky documents numerous examples of social revolution fomented in this way.
In 2001, text messages produced a million-person crowd in Manila, forcing the removal of Philippine President Joseph Estrada. In 2004, demonstrations organized by text messaging led to the ouster of Spanish Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar. In 2009, massive protests coordinated by social media caused the downfall of the Communist Party in Moldova. And in 2009, the Green Movement in Iran made global headlines, fueled by social media. Now we can add the Egyptian revolt to the list.
Why is this movement relevant to the rest of the world?
Egypt is most populous nation in the Arab world and Israel’s most significant political partner, supplying 40 percent of Israel’s natural gas. It also controls the Suez Canal, through which oil shipments are carried from the Red Sea to the Mediterranean and on to Europe and America. No one knows what would happen to the price of gasoline if these shipments were disrupted or halted. And regimes in this region sympathetic to al-Qaeda would strengthen radical Muslims around the world.
Is this movement toward democracy a good thing?
Writing in the current issue of World Affairs, Melik Kaylan chides America for refusing to encourage our values in Iraq. During the Cold War, he argues, we offered the world a coherent Western way of life. Today we no longer believe we have anything to teach other cultures. It is conventional wisdom that there are no absolutes — so long as we’re sincere in our beliefs and tolerant of others, we’ll all get along.
Here’s the problem: If we “liberate” a people only so they can conduct democratic elections, we can leave them victim to whatever forces are most organized at the time. There will almost always be a militant opposition to the existing government ready to step into the power vacuum that results, usually to the detriment of the people.
This happened when Hamas surprised the world by winning elections in Gaza; a similar process created the 1979 Islamic Revolution in Iran. It could happen again with the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.
It is vital that America encourage democratic reforms around the world. But it is equally urgent that a moral and spiritual foundation for democracy be built as well. A spiritual awakening must accompany the political revolution occurring in the Arab world.
Already, more Muslims are coming to Christ than ever before. I invite you to join me in praying every day for a great awakening in the Middle East. We could be on the edge of a spiritual phenomenon of global significance.