Baptist higher education faces a monumental crisis, due in large part to abuses of control and financial dependence, longtime university president Kirby Godsey told participants at the Whitsitt Baptist Heritage Society's annual meeting June 22 in Atlanta.
Godsey will retire this summer after 27 years as president of Mercer University in Macon, Ga. He received the Whitsitt Society's 2006 Courage Award and delivered the society's Penrose St. Amant Lecture on “The Future of Baptist Higher Education.”
“Baptist politics are wreaking havoc on Baptist higher education,” Godsey said. “Baptist higher education has never been more fragile.”
Because of their dependence upon Baptist state conventions, which provide a portion of their budgets and typically elect at least a majority of their trustees, Baptist schools increasingly are being “forced to sacrifice their intellectual integrity to ensure the flow of funds,” he reported.
Two Baptist universities have been involved in lawsuits with Baptist state conventions with which they are affiliated, and a suit looms on the horizon for another university and convention, Godsey said.
While Baptist educators and denominational leaders can chart a course of hope that benefits both church and school, “our present course is terrible,” he stressed.
“If they do not create a relationship based on mutual respect, Baptist educators will have to make the choice between being Baptists and being educators,” he added.
Control, and most particularly financial control, breeds difficulty, he said, noting state conventions' control over funding is being used to “enforce rigid religious orthodoxy.”
Some Baptists insist that their colleges and universities teach only concepts and ideas that align with their view of the world and religious beliefs, Godsey observed. But such narrow thinking restricts the schools from fulfilling their central mission, he added.
“The university's highest obligation is to pursue the truth and teach the truth,” he insisted, calling for commitment to academic inquiry and intellectual freedom. “A college or university cannot be a good Baptist college or university without first being a good college or university.”
Baptist schools traditionally have identified themselves with the denomination through “money and history” — receiving partial funding from and/or having a historical relationship with a Baptist convention, he said.
Now schools must “determine what it means in substance to be a Baptist university,” he added.
Godsey prescribed several suggestions for advancing educational or intellectual freedom while strengthening churches. They included:
• Re-thinking trustee selection. In recent years, many schools have been impacted negatively by trustees who are appointed to the institutional boards with specific political/theological agendas, which narrow the schools' focus, he said.
“Trustees should not be forced to choose between what's right for the institution and what's acceptable to the denomination. … Churches should get out of the business of selecting trustees.”
• Elevate the school's mission above politics. “Trustees are accountable not to a church constituency, but to [the university's] mission,” he explained.
• Replace “language of control.” Much of the rhetoric surrounding Baptist educational institutions has focused on power, control and win-lose scenarios, he reported, noting this “must yield to the language of cooperation.”
• Reclaim the power of administrative leadership. College and university administrators must “lead with resolve,” he said. Administrators, not faculty, are responsible for preserving academic freedom, preventing a “spiral of academic decay.”
• Invest in the Baptist ideal. Baptist principles have “seriously eroded in recent years,” Godsey said, asserting the schools are responsible to “keep alight the light of freedom.”