Baptist News Global
Sections
  • News
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Curated
  • Podcasts
    • Stuck in the Middle With You ↗
    • Madang with Grace Ji-Sun Kim ↗
    • Highest Power: Church + State ↗
    • Non-Disclosure: The Silenced Stories of Kanakuk Kamps Survivors ↗
    • Change-making Conversations ↗
  • Storytelling
    • Faith & Justice >
      • Charleston: Metanoia with Bill Stanfield
      • Charlotte: QC Family Tree with Greg and Helms Jarrell
      • Little Rock: Judge Wendell Griffen
      • North Carolina: Conetoe
    • Welcoming the Stranger >
      • Lost Boys of Sudan: St. John’s Baptist Charlotte
      • Awakening to Immigrant Justice: Myers Park Baptist Church
      • Hospitality on the corner: Gaston Christian Center
    • Signature Ministries >
      • Jake Hall: Gospel Gothic, Music and Radio
    • Singing Our Faith >
      • Hymns for a Lifetime: Ken Wilson and Knollwood Baptist Church
      • Norfolk Street Choir
    • Resilient Rural America >
      • Alabama: Perry County
      • Texas: Hidalgo County
      • Arkansas Delta
      • Southeast Kentucky
  • More
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donate
    • Associated Baptist Press Foundation
    • Planned Giving
    • Advertising
    • Ministry Jobs
    • Subscribe
    • Submissions and Permissions
Donate Subscribe
Search Search this site

Baptists, Catholics oppose D.C. laws

NewsBob Allen  |  February 11, 2015

By Bob Allen

Faith-based organizations with offices in Washington including the Southern Baptist Convention and the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops wrote a letter Feb. 5 asking Congress to reject two new District of Columbia laws they say would restrict their religious freedom.

The groups, all national organizations with offices in the nation’s capital, said both the Human Rights Amendment Act of 2014 and the Reproductive Health Non-Discrimination Act of 2014 adopted by the D.C. Council in December violate their religious beliefs.

capitol loresThe D.C. Council voted Dec. 2 to repeal the Armstrong Amendment, an act of Congress passed in 1988 after a court of appeals determined that Catholic-affiliated Georgetown University violated the city’s human rights act by refusing to recognize two student gay-rights groups.

On Dec. 17 the council expanded a requirement that employers not discriminate in “compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment” on the basis of sex to include discrimination based on reproductive health decisions, including abortion.

Faith-based employers including the SBC Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission said the Reproductive Health Non-Discrimination Act prevents them “from making employment decisions consistent with their sincerely held religious beliefs or their moral and ethical views about the sanctity of human life.”

The human rights amendment, they said, “requires religiously affiliated educational institutions to endorse, sponsor and provide school resources to persons or groups that oppose the institutions’ religious teachings regarding human sexuality.”

Both laws, they alleged, violate their rights protected both by the Constitution and federal law.

A committee report to the D.C. Council in October said while the District already has one of the strongest anti-discrimination laws in the country, a loophole allowed employers to discriminate against women for seeking to prevent pregnancy, get pregnant through reproductive technology or for having sex outside of marriage.

Some advocates said it could be used to reverse the Supreme Court’s Hobby Lobby decision in June 2014, which allowed employers to refuse insurance covering contraceptive services to workers based on religious beliefs of the owners.

The religious groups said the law “requires our organizations to hire or retain individuals whose speech or public conduct contradicts the organizations’ missions, and could be read to require our organizations to subsidize elective abortions through their employee health plans.”

Other groups signing the letter included Alliance Defending Freedom, the American Center for Law and Justice, the Catholic University of America, Concerned Women for America, Eagle Forum, Family Research Council and the National Association of Evangelicals.      

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • More
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
Tags:Hobby LobbyReligious LibertyAbortionPolitics
Bob Allen
More by
Bob Allen
  • Get BNG headlines in your inbox

  • Check out our podcasts

    Stuck in the Middle            Highest Power

               Madang                 Non-Disclosure

          Bible Divas                  This Is My Story

  • Politics • Faith • Resistance: by Greg Garrett

    BNG interview series on the state of faith, politics and resistance in our nation.

    See also Greg’s series on Politics, Faith and Mission

     

  • Featured

    • In conversation with Rick Pidcock about Weapons of Worship

      Opinion

    • Fake trans mailers and texts aim to scare Texans to vote for Paxton

      Analysis

    • Listen to the minor prophets as you vote

      Opinion

    • Current and past senior ministers urge HPUMC to vote for disaffiliation

      News


    Curated

    • US Catholic voters see economy as major issue in upcoming election

      US Catholic voters see economy as major issue in upcoming election

    • El-Sayed campaign hires Jewish outreach director

      El-Sayed campaign hires Jewish outreach director

    • Laura Davis and Stephen Cook to share leadership of Dawnings

      Laura Davis and Stephen Cook to share leadership of Dawnings

    • Pastor Philip Anthony Mitchell’s spiritual warfare is more political than he admits

      Pastor Philip Anthony Mitchell’s spiritual warfare is more political than he admits

    Conversations that Matter.

    © 2026 Baptist News Global. All rights reserved.

    Want to share a story? We hope you will! Read our republishing, terms of use and privacy policies here.

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • LinkedIn
    • RSS
    • bh