Baptist News Global
Sections
  • News
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Curated
  • Podcasts
    • Stuck in the Middle With You ↗
    • Madang with Grace Ji-Sun Kim ↗
    • Highest Power: Church + State ↗
    • Non-Disclosure: The Silenced Stories of Kanakuk Kamps Survivors ↗
    • Change-making Conversations ↗
  • Storytelling
    • Faith & Justice >
      • Charleston: Metanoia with Bill Stanfield
      • Charlotte: QC Family Tree with Greg and Helms Jarrell
      • Little Rock: Judge Wendell Griffen
      • North Carolina: Conetoe
    • Welcoming the Stranger >
      • Lost Boys of Sudan: St. John’s Baptist Charlotte
      • Awakening to Immigrant Justice: Myers Park Baptist Church
      • Hospitality on the corner: Gaston Christian Center
    • Signature Ministries >
      • Jake Hall: Gospel Gothic, Music and Radio
    • Singing Our Faith >
      • Hymns for a Lifetime: Ken Wilson and Knollwood Baptist Church
      • Norfolk Street Choir
    • Resilient Rural America >
      • Alabama: Perry County
      • Texas: Hidalgo County
      • Arkansas Delta
      • Southeast Kentucky
  • More
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donate
    • Associated Baptist Press Foundation
    • Planned Giving
    • Advertising
    • Ministry Jobs
    • Subscribe
    • Submissions and Permissions
Donate Subscribe
Search Search this site

Bush comments appear to back Federal Marriage Amendment

NewsABPnews  |  December 23, 2003

WASHINGTON (ABP) — President Bush is drawing fire from both the left and the right after he made comments in a television interview that appeared simultaneously to endorse a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage and support states' rights to create marriage-like “civil unions” for same-sex couples.

In a interview with ABC-TV's Diane Sawyer, televised Dec. 16, Bush appeared to back an effort in Congress to amend the constitution to ban marriage and “the legal incidents thereof” to same-sex couples. Called the Federal Marriage Amendment, it has received major publicity since recent court rulings expanding gay rights.

Religious Right groups strongly support the proposal. Although previously the White House had avoided endorsing the amendment, Bush appeared to cast his support behind it in the interview. “If necessary, I will support a constitutional amendment which would honor marriage between a man and a woman, codify that,” Bush said when asked about the issue, according to a transcript.

However, Bush also told Sawyer that “the position of this administration is that whatever legal arrangements people want to make, they're allowed to make, so long as it's embraced by the state or at the state level.”

Many on both sides of the issue interpreted that statement to mean Bush would support states' rights to create “civil unions,” or state-sanctioned arrangements that confer most or all of the legal benefits and responsibilities of marriage on same-sex couples. Vermont already has a civil-unions law, and California recently began conferring domestic-partnership benefits to same-sex couples.

However, many conservative groups that form the base of Bush's support oppose any legalization of civil unions. In his Dec. 17 e-mail newsletter to supporters, Family Research Council President Tony Perkins said he was “concerned that the President thinks counterfeit institutions such as same-sex unions are OK and do not threaten to devalue the real thing.”

When asked to clarify the issue during his regular Dec. 18 briefing, White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan simply reiterated Bush's comments.

“The president has always been strongly supportive of the principle that marriage is a sacred institution between a man and a woman, and that he will do what it takes to protect and defend the sanctity of marriage,” McClellan told reporters.

However, he added, “We said, going back to the [2000 presidential] campaign, that states have the right to decide legal arrangements that they so choose.”

But the leader of the nation's largest gay and lesbian Republican organization expressed concern about Bush's apparent support for the amendment. “While we are pleased that the president has clearly stated his support of states' rights, we are concerned that the president said he might support amending the United States Constitution,” said Patrick Guerriero, executive director of the Log Cabin Republicans, in a Dec. 16 statement.

“The proposed Federal Marriage Amendment would not only ban civil recognition of gay families, it would also strip fundamental rights and responsibilities from those families,” Guerriero continued. “Supporting the proposed Federal Marriage Amendment is wrong, it is not necessary and would codify discrimination in our Constitution.”

-30-

Tags:Archives
ABPnews
More by
ABPnews
  • This BNG series of articles on Christianity and democracy led toward the July 4 celebration of America’s 250th birthday. The series was curated by Carol McEntyre, senior minister at First Baptist Church of Greenville, S.C.  See the series here.

     

  • Get BNG headlines in your inbox

  • Check out our podcasts

    Stuck in the Middle            Highest Power

               Madang                 Non-Disclosure

          Bible Divas                  This Is My Story

  • Politics • Faith • Resistance: by Greg Garrett

    BNG interview series on the state of faith, politics and resistance in our nation.

    See also Greg’s series on Politics, Faith and Mission

     

  • Featured

    • Talarico pledges support for church-state separation

      News

    • Muslim panelists say Islamophobia makes no sense to them

      News

    • Federal judge allows religious charter school in Oklahoma — for now

      News

    • Coalition urges care for freedom of religion and speech

      News


    Curated

    • Pope warns a ‘paradise of machines’ could undermine humanity as he opens France trip

      Pope warns a ‘paradise of machines’ could undermine humanity as he opens France trip

    • Edinburgh University ends divinity programmes as theology faces a changing future

      Edinburgh University ends divinity programmes as theology faces a changing future

    • Sukkot reminds us we can be vulnerable without falling

      Sukkot reminds us we can be vulnerable without falling

    • Why Private Religion and Public Religion Tell Different Stories

      Why Private Religion and Public Religion Tell Different Stories

    Conversations that Matter.

    © 2026 Baptist News Global. All rights reserved.

    Want to share a story? We hope you will! Read our republishing, terms of use and privacy policies here.

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • LinkedIn
    • RSS
    • bh