Baptist News Global
Sections
  • News
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Curated
  • Podcasts
    • Stuck in the Middle With You ↗
    • Madang with Grace Ji-Sun Kim ↗
    • Highest Power: Church + State ↗
    • Non-Disclosure: The Silenced Stories of Kanakuk Kamps Survivors ↗
    • Change-making Conversations ↗
  • Storytelling
    • Faith & Justice >
      • Charleston: Metanoia with Bill Stanfield
      • Charlotte: QC Family Tree with Greg and Helms Jarrell
      • Little Rock: Judge Wendell Griffen
      • North Carolina: Conetoe
    • Welcoming the Stranger >
      • Lost Boys of Sudan: St. John’s Baptist Charlotte
      • Awakening to Immigrant Justice: Myers Park Baptist Church
      • Hospitality on the corner: Gaston Christian Center
    • Signature Ministries >
      • Jake Hall: Gospel Gothic, Music and Radio
    • Singing Our Faith >
      • Hymns for a Lifetime: Ken Wilson and Knollwood Baptist Church
      • Norfolk Street Choir
    • Resilient Rural America >
      • Alabama: Perry County
      • Texas: Hidalgo County
      • Arkansas Delta
      • Southeast Kentucky
  • More
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donate
    • Associated Baptist Press Foundation
    • Planned Giving
    • Advertising
    • Ministry Jobs
    • Subscribe
    • Submissions and Permissions
Donate Subscribe
Search Search this site

Court sidesteps campaign-finance case brought by Wisconsin pro-life group

NewsABPnews  |  November 29, 1999

WASHINGTON (ABP) — The Supreme Court on Jan. 23 sidestepped a challenge brought by an anti-abortion group against a federal campaign-finance law.

The court, in an unsigned opinion without recorded dissent, directed a lower federal court to reconsider its decision banning television ads by a Wisconsin group that mentioned a senator running for re-election in 2004. The high court’s decision in Wisconsin Right to Life v. Federal Election Commission (No. 04-1581) means the justices will not, for the time being, consider the constitutionality of the 2002 McCain-Feingold Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.

That law, designed to limit the influence of special-interest groups on elections, bans the use of corporate or union funds to pay for “electioneering communications” that mention candidates for federal office by name within two months of a general election. Some groups have opposed the law as an unconstitutional limit on free speech.

The Wisconsin group had wished to air ads in the state calling on both of its United States senators — including one of the campaign-finance law’s authors, Democrat Russell Feingold — to oppose filibusters of President Bush’s judicial nominees. Feingold supports abortion rights and was, at the time, running for re-election.

The group said the McCain-Feingold law’s ban on advertisements mentioning a candidate for federal office were unconstitutional as applied to its commercials. Its attorneys described those ads, in court papers, as “grass-roots lobbying advertisements.”

The lower court disagreed, citing a 2003 Supreme Court decision that turned away a broad challenge to the campaign-finance law. But in their Jan. 23 decision, the Supreme Court justices said the lower court misinterpreted the precedent.

The decision means the court is not likely to render a decision on the constitutionality of the law before the 2006 federal election. However, the law is likely to return to the Supreme Court after the lower court again deals with it.

The decision came down the same day as thousands of anti-abortion activists converged on the court and other Washington landmarks to commemorate the 33rd anniversary of Roe v. Wade. That landmark 1973 decision legalized abortion nationwide.

-30-

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • More
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
Tags:ArchivesABP archives
More by
ABPnews
  • Get BNG headlines in your inbox

  • Check out our podcasts

     

     

    Stuck in the Middle
    With You

     

    Madang
    With Grace Ji-Sun Kim

     

     

    Highest Power
    Church+State

     

     

    Non-Disclosure:
    The Silenced Stories
    of Kanakuk Kamps Survivors

     

    Change-making
    Conversations

     

     

  • Politics • Faith • Resistance: by Greg Garrett

    BNG interview series on the state of faith, politics and resistance in our nation.

    See also Greg’s series on Politics, Faith and Mission

     

  • Featured

    • Islamophobia is the next bogeyman

      Opinion

    • The Black Church cannot remain America’s emergency moral infrastructure

      Opinion

    • We are manna

      Opinion

    • Webinar explores religious context of America’s Founders

      News


    Curated

    • Staunch Israel critic and Gaza trauma surgeon Adam Hamawy wins NJ-12 primary

      Staunch Israel critic and Gaza trauma surgeon Adam Hamawy wins NJ-12 primary

    • Elderly Christian Among 31 Sentenced In China Church Crackdown

      Elderly Christian Among 31 Sentenced In China Church Crackdown

    • In U.F.O. Files, Some Christians See Vexing Questions — and Demons

      In U.F.O. Files, Some Christians See Vexing Questions — and Demons

    • Christian theologians react to the pope’s ai warning

      Christian theologians react to the pope’s ai warning

    Conversations that Matter.

    © 2026 Baptist News Global. All rights reserved.

    Want to share a story? We hope you will! Read our republishing, terms of use and privacy policies here.

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • LinkedIn
    • RSS
    • 129