Baptist News Global
Sections
  • News
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Curated
  • Podcasts
    • Stuck in the Middle With You ↗
    • Madang with Grace Ji-Sun Kim ↗
    • Highest Power: Church + State ↗
    • Non-Disclosure: The Silenced Stories of Kanakuk Kamps Survivors ↗
    • Change-making Conversations ↗
  • Storytelling
    • Faith & Justice >
      • Charleston: Metanoia with Bill Stanfield
      • Charlotte: QC Family Tree with Greg and Helms Jarrell
      • Little Rock: Judge Wendell Griffen
      • North Carolina: Conetoe
    • Welcoming the Stranger >
      • Lost Boys of Sudan: St. John’s Baptist Charlotte
      • Awakening to Immigrant Justice: Myers Park Baptist Church
      • Hospitality on the corner: Gaston Christian Center
    • Signature Ministries >
      • Jake Hall: Gospel Gothic, Music and Radio
    • Singing Our Faith >
      • Hymns for a Lifetime: Ken Wilson and Knollwood Baptist Church
      • Norfolk Street Choir
    • Resilient Rural America >
      • Alabama: Perry County
      • Texas: Hidalgo County
      • Arkansas Delta
      • Southeast Kentucky
  • More
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donate
    • Associated Baptist Press Foundation
    • Planned Giving
    • Advertising
    • Ministry Jobs
    • Subscribe
    • Submissions and Permissions
Donate Subscribe
Search Search this site

Court sidesteps campaign-finance case brought by Wisconsin pro-life group

NewsABPnews  |  November 29, 1999

WASHINGTON (ABP) — The Supreme Court on Jan. 23 sidestepped a challenge brought by an anti-abortion group against a federal campaign-finance law.

The court, in an unsigned opinion without recorded dissent, directed a lower federal court to reconsider its decision banning television ads by a Wisconsin group that mentioned a senator running for re-election in 2004. The high court’s decision in Wisconsin Right to Life v. Federal Election Commission (No. 04-1581) means the justices will not, for the time being, consider the constitutionality of the 2002 McCain-Feingold Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.

That law, designed to limit the influence of special-interest groups on elections, bans the use of corporate or union funds to pay for “electioneering communications” that mention candidates for federal office by name within two months of a general election. Some groups have opposed the law as an unconstitutional limit on free speech.

The Wisconsin group had wished to air ads in the state calling on both of its United States senators — including one of the campaign-finance law’s authors, Democrat Russell Feingold — to oppose filibusters of President Bush’s judicial nominees. Feingold supports abortion rights and was, at the time, running for re-election.

The group said the McCain-Feingold law’s ban on advertisements mentioning a candidate for federal office were unconstitutional as applied to its commercials. Its attorneys described those ads, in court papers, as “grass-roots lobbying advertisements.”

The lower court disagreed, citing a 2003 Supreme Court decision that turned away a broad challenge to the campaign-finance law. But in their Jan. 23 decision, the Supreme Court justices said the lower court misinterpreted the precedent.

The decision means the court is not likely to render a decision on the constitutionality of the law before the 2006 federal election. However, the law is likely to return to the Supreme Court after the lower court again deals with it.

The decision came down the same day as thousands of anti-abortion activists converged on the court and other Washington landmarks to commemorate the 33rd anniversary of Roe v. Wade. That landmark 1973 decision legalized abortion nationwide.

-30-

Tags:ArchivesABP archives
ABPnews
More by
ABPnews
  • This BNG series of articles on Christianity and democracy led toward the July 4 celebration of America’s 250th birthday. The series was curated by Carol McEntyre, senior minister at First Baptist Church of Greenville, S.C.  See the series here.

     

  • Get BNG headlines in your inbox

  • Check out our podcasts

    Stuck in the Middle            Highest Power

               Madang                 Non-Disclosure

          Bible Divas                  This Is My Story

  • Politics • Faith • Resistance: by Greg Garrett

    BNG interview series on the state of faith, politics and resistance in our nation.

    See also Greg’s series on Politics, Faith and Mission

     

  • Featured

    • How AI has made child sexual abuse more prevalent

      Analysis

    • Haberman discusses Trump’s health, cruelty and GOP enablers

      News

    • You preach against slavery, so why not preach for voting?

      Opinion

    • My hopelessly bipolar relationship with institutional religion

      Opinion


    Curated

    • ACNA deposes breakaway bishop formerly in charge of chaplains group

      ACNA deposes breakaway bishop formerly in charge of chaplains group

    • Pope Leo XIV Contradicts Trump, Says AI Safety Concerns Aren’t ‘Fake News’

      Pope Leo XIV Contradicts Trump, Says AI Safety Concerns Aren’t ‘Fake News’

    • Why is Karl Rove supporting a progressive Jewish candidate in Texas?

      Why is Karl Rove supporting a progressive Jewish candidate in Texas?

    • The medieval world had its own ‘deepfakes’ – church officials cited a fake imperial decree for centuries

      The medieval world had its own ‘deepfakes’ – church officials cited a fake imperial decree for centuries

    Conversations that Matter.

    © 2026 Baptist News Global. All rights reserved.

    Want to share a story? We hope you will! Read our republishing, terms of use and privacy policies here.

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • LinkedIn
    • RSS
    • bh