Baptist News Global
Sections
  • News
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Curated
  • Storytelling
    • Faith & Justice >
      • Charleston: Metanoia with Bill Stanfield
      • Charlotte: QC Family Tree with Greg and Helms Jarrell
      • Little Rock: Judge Wendell Griffen
      • North Carolina: Conetoe
    • Welcoming the Stranger >
      • Lost Boys of Sudan: St. John’s Baptist Charlotte
      • Awakening to Immigrant Justice: Myers Park Baptist Church
      • Hospitality on the corner: Gaston Christian Center
    • Signature Ministries >
      • Jake Hall: Gospel Gothic, Music and Radio
    • Singing Our Faith >
      • Hymns for a Lifetime: Ken Wilson and Knollwood Baptist Church
      • Norfolk Street Choir
    • Resilient Rural America >
      • Alabama: Perry County
      • Texas: Hidalgo County
      • Arkansas Delta
      • Southeast Kentucky
  • More
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donate
    • Planned Giving
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Advertising
    • Ministry Jobs and More
    • Transitions
    • Subscribe
    • Submissions and Permissions
Support independent, faith-based journalism. Donate
Search Search this site

How the nuns won at the Supreme Court and why it matters

AnalysisRobert W. Coleman  |  July 16, 2020

Most people probably had not heard of The Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home before it joined the fight with the federal government over required coverage of contraception in employer-provided medical insurance plans. That was the heart of a closely watched decision from the United States Supreme Court released July 8, the final day of the current term of the court.

Robert W. Coleman

Many Christians assumed this decision could be one of the most important in recent times in affirming the First Amendment right of free exercise of religion and in causing further damage to one of the signature rights established under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, also known as the ACA. The decision, however, is more proof that T.S. Elliott was right about how things may end — not with a bang, but a whimper.

A careful reading of the court’s opinion finds this is not a First Amendment case at all. It is, instead, a case about how government agencies may interpret legislation and what accommodations they must make for people with sincere religious beliefs because of the 1993 Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

The Little Sisters of the Poor is “an international congregation of Roman Catholic women” who have operated homes for the elderly poor in the United States since 1868. Their mission has nothing to do with procreation or reproductive medical services. They are, however, devout Catholics and thus believe no person should take any action to avoid reproduction through medical means; to do so, they believe, is immoral.

Because they are employers of some women of child-bearing age, they would have been required to provide contraception coverage as part of their medical insurance benefits. The Little Sisters refused to do this, citing strict Catholic doctrine against birth control.

Surprisingly, the Supreme Court decision in favor of the Little Sisters is a 7-2 decision by the court, not a 5-4 ruling that so often emerges on controversial social issues.

Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the opinion of the court, which was supported by the chief justice and four of the nine justices. Justice Alito filed a concurring opinion, joined by Justice Gorsuch. Justice Kagan filed an opinion concurring in the judgment of the court, in which Justice Breyer joined. Justice Ginsburg wrote a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Sotomayor joined. And that is not the most complicated part to explain.

The 26-page majority opinion, together with Alito’s concurrence, highlights one important conclusion about the Little Sisters case that should change the perception of the decision. As Thomas writes: “No party has pressed a constitutional challenge to the breadth of the delegation involved here. … The only question we face today is what the plain language of the statute authorizes.” And Alito concurs: “Before this Court, the States do not argue — and there is no basis for an argument — that the new rule violates that (Establishment) Clause.”

“The Little Sisters decision is a purely administrative law decision.”

The Little Sisters decision is a purely administrative law decision, ironically relying upon the language of ACA itself, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, and typical administrative law reasoning. As Thomas recites, the ACA did not include any mention of required contraception coverage. Rather, the ACA only states that group health plans for employees “must provide women with preventive care and screenings … as provided for” in guidelines to be promulgated by the Health Resources and Services Administration, a division of the Department of Health and Human Services. Those guidelines, not the law itself, set forth the mandate that all plans must cover all FDA-approved contraceptive methods.

When HHS issued the guidelines, it authorized a plan to exempt religious employers, such as churches, from being required to provide contraception coverage. Later this was expanded to allow other qualifying religious organizations to opt out of this coverage by self-certifying to their insurer that they met certain religious criteria. The Little Sisters objected to this modification because they felt that self-certifying meant they would be complicit in someone getting access to contraception through their actions.

The attacks on this attempt to work around the problem created by insurance policy rules all were based upon alleged violations of RFRA, not the First Amendment. RFRA at the time of its passage was hailed as a defining beacon of interpretation of religious liberty. The Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty helped shepherd its passage.

In attempting to satisfy the Little Sisters and others after the Hobby Lobby decision, governmental agencies broadened the attempted accommodations to include more organizations under the church exemption and added a “moral exemption” for employers, including public companies, objecting to providing some or all of the contested contraception coverage. It is this rule that Justice Thomas affirms as valid under the ACA and the Administrative Procedures Act against the attack by two states.

In rejecting the two states’ arguments, Thomas and the court find that the ACA properly delegates the right to issue guidelines for both the mandate and the religious exceptions, even in its revised broadened formulation. Once the authority for the guidelines was established, the court quickly dismissed the procedural attacks. These rulings are substantially the same as any other decision about any administratively adopted implementation of new legislation (although it had taken nearly eight years to complete the adoption of the final version of the rules in their broadened form) decided without regard to the Constitution.

“The Little Sisters’ decision is important for other reasons.”

Yet the Little Sisters’ decision is important for other reasons — for what it does do and doesn’t do. A careful reading of Thomas’ opinion shows a concern with making sure the Little Sisters’ rulings cannot be used in any way to attack the Hobby Lobby decision, which was widely praised by conservative Christian groups and eschewed by traditional interpreters of church-state separation. Thomas seems to go out of his way not to decide whether RFRA independently compelled the accommodation set forth in the government’s final rule on contraception coverage. In the multiple places Thomas invokes Hobby Lobby to support his ruling, he seems to show a concern that looking at RFRA might reopen an examination of the rationale used in Hobby Lobby. It seems doubly ironic that he uses his conclusion that the language of the ACA provides a basis for the exemptions in the rules to support “not deciding whether RFRA independently compelled the Department’s solution.”

President Donald Trump greets the Little Sisters of the Poor before signing an executive order on Promoting Free Speech and Religious Liberty a during a National Day of Prayer event in the Rose Garden of the White House on May 4, 2017. (Photo by Olivier Douliery/ Abaca(Sipa via AP Images)

There may be another more buried purpose for the details of the Thomas opinion, however. In Footnote 8, Thomas provides a suggested solution to the entire issue of the contraception controversy to date, but which would surely bring a firestorm of objections from more liberal proponents of the mandate. Thomas states that the government, relying upon the administrative basis for prior alterations to the ACA guidelines, could “remove the contraception coverage from the next iteration of its guidelines” and “arguably nullify the contraception mandate altogether without proceeding through notice and comment.”

The court sent the cases back to the lower courts, to be re-evaluated in light of the Supreme Court opinions. That is where the concurring opinions become important, as possible forecasts of what is yet to come.

Alito’s concurrence and Ginsberg’s dissent highlight one possible future issue for the courts below — whether the version of the contraception coverage rule approved by the majority of the court was required by RFRA. Alito claims strongly that RFRA “compels an exception for the Little Sisters and any other employer with a similar objection to what has been called the accommodation to the contraception mandate.” In doing so, he points out that nothing in the ACA “abrogates RFRA,” an alternative way of avoiding RFRA in new legislation.

“The government failed to show that it has a compelling interest in insuring that ‘all women have access to all FDA-approved contraception,’ in part because the ACA does not come close to providing ‘all women’ this coverage.”

Most of Alito’s opinion is a detailed analysis of the threefold test for compliance with RFRA. He states that Hobby Lobby already held that the mandate fails test one because it found that the mandate is a substantial burden on any employer like the Little Sisters, who have a sincere religious objection to the use of some or all contraception. He would find that the government failed to show that it has a compelling interest in insuring that “all women have access to all FDA-approved contraception,” in part because the ACA does not come close to providing “all women” this coverage.

He again looks to Hobby Lobby to conclude that the self-certifying accommodation was not the “least-restrictive means” to accomplish the ACA purpose. Once he concludes more was required, Alito examines the final rule and concludes that it should survive as the majority held because governmental departments “were required by RFRA to create the religious exception (or something very close to it).” There is no doubt that, since the majority did not follow his wishes, Alito wants the lower courts to follow his concurrence and rule that the exemption is required by RFRA.

Meanwhile, the Kagan concurrence provides a succinct summary of the differences between the majority and the dissent: “Both the majority and the dissent agree that HRSA’s guidelines can differentiate among preventive services, mandating coverage of some but not others. The opinions disagree about whether those guidelines can also differentiate among health plans, exempting some but not others from the contraception-coverage requirement. On that question, all the two opinions have in common is equal certainty that they are right.”

Kagan concurs in the judgment of the majority by relying upon the earlier Chevron decision, which held that when a court is required to rule upon the scope of an agency’s statutory authority under an ambiguous statute, it should “accede to a reasonable interpretation by the implementing agency.” She believes the government has maintained its right to create exceptions to the contraception mandate for some employers from the beginning even though the precise rule has changed several times. Her conclusion thus was to “defer to that longstanding and reasonable interpretation.”

Kagan points out that the courts below invalidated the exemptions because they found them to be outside the statutory authority of government agencies, which the court’s opinion reverses. The lower courts, however, did not rule on the two states’ argument that the exemption was also “arbitrary and capricious.” She concludes that the issue “is now ready for resolution, unaffected by today’s decision.” That is an issue to watch in the next round of court action.

The remainder of Kagan’s concurrence is a sharp, intellectual description of why the latest exemption may not withstand an analysis of whether its adoption was “arbitrary and capricious.” Parties and pundits wanting to look to the future should read her opinion carefully for its predictions of what the courts below could yet do to the current administration’s attempts to resolve and narrow the ACA contraception coverage.

That future might also make Thomas’ gratuitous suggestion in Footnote 8 of the majority opinion reappear as well — if anyone in the right government agency who writes the next set of guidelines is listening.

Robert W. Coleman is an attorney in Dallas and a longtime commentator on religious liberty issues. His passion for First Amendment issues was sparked, in part, by his lifelong friendship with the late Phil Strickland, who in his lifetime was a nationally known advocate for religious liberty causes.

Tags:RFRASupreme CourtContraceptionLittle Sisters of the PoorACARobert W. Coleman
Robert W. Coleman
More by
Robert W. Coleman
  • Get BNG headlines in your inbox

  • Featured

    • Here’s help for addressing mental health in marriage

      News

    • Why we must not turn away from the Derek Chauvin trial

      Opinion

    • From Texas to Tennessee, evangelical parents are trying to take the ‘public’ out of public education

      Opinion

    • When the dying stops, will we remember to address the multiplied grief of COVID?

      News


    Curated

    • Liberty University shake-ups continue as Falwell Jr.’s son leaves post as VP

      Liberty University shake-ups continue as Falwell Jr.’s son leaves post as VP

      April 15, 2021
    • As policies shift, Protestants and other faith groups join Catholics in helping immigrants at the border

      As policies shift, Protestants and other faith groups join Catholics in helping immigrants at the border

      April 15, 2021
    • Religious leaders recall Prince Philip’s spiritual curiosity

      Religious leaders recall Prince Philip’s spiritual curiosity

      April 15, 2021
    • How ‘complementarianism’ – the belief that God assigned specific gender roles – became part of evangelical doctrine

      How ‘complementarianism’ – the belief that God assigned specific gender roles – became part of evangelical doctrine

      April 14, 2021
    Read Next:

    When politics becomes religion

    OpinionDavid Gushee, Senior Columnist

    More Articles

    • All
    • News
    • Opinion
    • Curated
    • On Earth Day: Let’s walk on water together

      OpinionKatherine Smith

    • Attacks on Critical Race Theory are ‘attempt to maintain the status quo’

      NewsJeff Brumley

    • From Texas to Tennessee, evangelical parents are trying to take the ‘public’ out of public education

      OpinionMark Wingfield

    • When the dying stops, will we remember to address the multiplied grief of COVID?

      NewsMark Wingfield

    • Baylor and Buckner remind us: We’ve not yet reckoned with our past ties to slavery

      OpinionMichael Chancellor

    • On Earth Day, let us remember the earth is filled with God’s glory

      OpinionPhawnda Moore

    • CeCe Winans is experiencing a season of firsts

      NewsMaina Mwaura

    • Climate change is heating up the terrorist conflict in Africa’s Sahel region

      NewsAnthony Akaeze

    • Learning to see my hometown from a different perspective with a little help from my friends

      OpinionEric Minton

    • Join BNG webinar with Beth Allison Barr to discuss ‘biblical womanhood’

      NewsBNG staff

    • Transitions for the week of 4-16-21

      NewsBarbara Francis

    • Texas takes the spotlight as statehouses across the nation seek to restrict trans teens and voter access

      AnalysisMark Wingfield

    • Why we must not turn away from the Derek Chauvin trial

      OpinionFloyd Thompkins

    • Ways of seeing racism

      OpinionDuke L. Kwon and Gregory Thompson

    • Here’s help for addressing mental health in marriage

      NewsJeff Brumley

    • Ministry jobs and more

      NewsBarbara Francis

    • America 2021: Got church and steeple but where are the people?

      OpinionBill Leonard, Senior Columnist

    • Finding sabbath in a hammock

      OpinionPatrick Wilson

    • ‘Pandemic acknowledges no religious exemption,’ interfaith group warns state legislatures

      NewsMark Wingfield

    • When politics becomes religion

      OpinionDavid Gushee, Senior Columnist

    • Kieve senses a calling to new role helping churches prevent and respond to sexual abuse

      NewsJeff Brumley

    • ‘The Bible says’: Sermons then and now

      OpinionCarl Kell

    • Join Ryan Burge and Mark Wingfield for a free webinar on the ‘nones’

      NewsBNG staff

    • It’s up to the Senate now to fix our democracy

      OpinionElder Lee Harris

    • De La Torre calls for ‘badass believers’ to decolonize Christianity

      NewsJeff Brumley

    • Attacks on Critical Race Theory are ‘attempt to maintain the status quo’

      NewsJeff Brumley

    • When the dying stops, will we remember to address the multiplied grief of COVID?

      NewsMark Wingfield

    • CeCe Winans is experiencing a season of firsts

      NewsMaina Mwaura

    • Climate change is heating up the terrorist conflict in Africa’s Sahel region

      NewsAnthony Akaeze

    • Join BNG webinar with Beth Allison Barr to discuss ‘biblical womanhood’

      NewsBNG staff

    • Transitions for the week of 4-16-21

      NewsBarbara Francis

    • Here’s help for addressing mental health in marriage

      NewsJeff Brumley

    • Ministry jobs and more

      NewsBarbara Francis

    • ‘Pandemic acknowledges no religious exemption,’ interfaith group warns state legislatures

      NewsMark Wingfield

    • Kieve senses a calling to new role helping churches prevent and respond to sexual abuse

      NewsJeff Brumley

    • Join Ryan Burge and Mark Wingfield for a free webinar on the ‘nones’

      NewsBNG staff

    • De La Torre calls for ‘badass believers’ to decolonize Christianity

      NewsJeff Brumley

    • Another Friday night, another Supreme Court rapid ruling on churches and COVID

      NewsMark Wingfield

    • Now Beth Moore is taking on patriarchy in the church

      NewsMark Wingfield

    • When pastors change churches during a global pandemic, it takes creativity and perseverance

      NewsJeff Brumley

    • Angry man with bulldozer severely damages Dellanna West O’Brien School in Liberia

      NewsGrace Thornton

    • Chip Gaines writes about building a network of support and not being constrained by conventional wisdom

      NewsMaina Mwaura

    • Months after two hurricanes, vaccinated volunteers finally heading to Lake Charles

      NewsJeff Brumley

    • Ministry jobs and more

      NewsBarbara Francis

    • Contrary to what you’ve heard, study finds churches thrive with racial diversity

      NewsCynthia Astle

    • CBF Benefits Board names executive vice president and COO

      NewsMark Wingfield

    • In state legislatures, a push against trans teens, for churches as ‘essential’ and seeking to define ‘religious freedom’

      NewsMark Wingfield

    • What we missed most about in-person church, what’s coming back and what’s likely to change

      NewsJeff Brumley

    • If you want to help the poor, first understand their humanity

      NewsJeff Brumley

    • Second Easter during pandemic brings greater sense of hope nationwide

      NewsMark Wingfield

    • On Earth Day: Let’s walk on water together

      OpinionKatherine Smith

    • From Texas to Tennessee, evangelical parents are trying to take the ‘public’ out of public education

      OpinionMark Wingfield

    • Baylor and Buckner remind us: We’ve not yet reckoned with our past ties to slavery

      OpinionMichael Chancellor

    • On Earth Day, let us remember the earth is filled with God’s glory

      OpinionPhawnda Moore

    • Learning to see my hometown from a different perspective with a little help from my friends

      OpinionEric Minton

    • Why we must not turn away from the Derek Chauvin trial

      OpinionFloyd Thompkins

    • Ways of seeing racism

      OpinionDuke L. Kwon and Gregory Thompson

    • America 2021: Got church and steeple but where are the people?

      OpinionBill Leonard, Senior Columnist

    • Finding sabbath in a hammock

      OpinionPatrick Wilson

    • When politics becomes religion

      OpinionDavid Gushee, Senior Columnist

    • ‘The Bible says’: Sermons then and now

      OpinionCarl Kell

    • It’s up to the Senate now to fix our democracy

      OpinionElder Lee Harris

    • Here’s something to try on for size: Talk about things that are ‘more-than-human’

      OpinionCody J. Sanders

    • Would Jesus wear $800 sandals?

      OpinionTerry Austin

    • Where is Mike Huckabee?

      OpinionRobert P. Sellers

    • We cannot now close our border to those fleeing the horror we helped create

      OpinionChris Conley

    • That time I went to the school board meeting to speak against banning books

      OpinionMark Wingfield

    • What I found hidden in my mother’s Bible after her death

      OpinionKim Brewer

    • Four ways to help others through grief and mourning amid social isolation

      OpinionJacob George

    • A few good men?: Promising Young Woman and the culture of abuse

      OpinionGreg Garrett, Senior Columnist

    • I knew the truth about women in the Bible, and I stayed silent

      OpinionBeth Allison Barr

    • How American exceptionalism is killing America

      OpinionRichard T. Hughes

    • The end of American exceptionalism

      OpinionSteve Sullivan

    • To live into Easter, we need to keep writing a new song

      OpinionLaura Mayo

    • How to find resilience for the long run of COVID, as we’re ‘almost there, but not quite yet’

      OpinionPaula Mangum Sheridan

    • Liberty University shake-ups continue as Falwell Jr.’s son leaves post as VP

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • As policies shift, Protestants and other faith groups join Catholics in helping immigrants at the border

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Religious leaders recall Prince Philip’s spiritual curiosity

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • How ‘complementarianism’ – the belief that God assigned specific gender roles – became part of evangelical doctrine

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Can America’s ‘Civil Religion’ Still Unite The Country?

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Fox stands behind Tucker Carlson after ADL urges his firing

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • How a Georgia pastor practiced what he preached by accepting LGBTQ members into his Southern Baptist church

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Public policy leader Weston Ware dies at age 88

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Panel advances bill to let Arkansas teachers talk creationism

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Are LGBTQ students at Christian schools discriminated against? A lawsuit, scholarly studies say yes.

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • A Georgia church, kicked out of the SBC for allowing gay members, wants to make sure ‘everybody’s welcome’

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Faith leaders call for elimination of Senate filibuster

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Joe Biden is not planning to solve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Christian nationalism is a barrier to mass vaccination against COVID-19

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Celebrity lineup to read King’s anti-war speech on assassination anniversary

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Montana House backs bill on religious challenges to rules

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Georgia faith leaders to leave water bottles around Capitol in protest of new voter laws

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Vatican makes moral case for supporting people displaced by climate change

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Baylor partnership brings Baptist Standard archive online

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Survey: Most Americans know Biden is Catholic, far fewer know Harris’ religion

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Georgia’s new GOP election law draws criticism, lawsuits

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • At nationwide rallies, Christians stand up for Asian Americans

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Appellate court arguments set for Charleston church shooter

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Franklin Graham unfazed after evangelical base blasts him for encouraging vaccines

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Shooter at Kansas Jewish centers appeals death sentence

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    Conversations that Matter.

    © 2021 Baptist News Global. All rights reserved.

    Want to share a story? We hope you will! Read our republishing, terms of use and privacy policies here.

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • LinkedIn
    • RSS