AUSTIN, Texas (ABP) — Baylor University theology professor Barry Harvey took just two texts to a church's recent seminar on reconciling faith and science: the Bible and Charles Darwin’s Origin of Species.
“Far too often, [discussing faith and science] generates heat rather than light,” Harvey said, introducing the all-day conference, called “Science and Faith: Breaking Down the Wall,” at First Baptist Church of Austin, Texas.
Harvey joined colleagues Phyllis Tippit, lecturer in the Baylor Interdisciplinary Core, and Gerald Cleaver, associate professor of physics at Baylor, as speakers for the Jan. 23 event for clergy and laypeople alike, sponsored by the Baylor University Center for Ministry Effectiveness and Educational Leadership.
The seminar, featuring three lectures and plenty of participant discussion, addressed the conflict many Christians feel when discussing faith and science — if the conversation happens at all.
“The subject of faith and science is a very sensitive topic for a lot of good Christian people,” said Don Schmeltekopf, director of Baylor’s Center for Ministry Effectiveness and Educational Leadership. “When you start talking about the universe being 13.7 billion years old, many people respond: ‘What are you talking about? I don’t read my Bible that way.’”
“It gets so divisive,” said Shelley Hargrove, a seminar participant and member of the Austin church, commenting on discussions of Christianity and science.
Harvey opened the seminar with a lecture titled: “What’s God Got to Do With It? Why Theology and the Physical Sciences Are Not In (Epistemic) Competition.”
“What does it mean to say we know something?” Harvey asked.
Literal interpretations — specifically of biblical texts — invoke contemporary conventions and define what’s important in text, sometimes regardless of the author’s original intent, he explained. With regular references to God’s ultimate sovereignty, Harvey cautioned against dogmatism and the notion that a specific kind of knowledge can “trump” all others, in either faith or science.
“It is not an insult to say that science cannot answer every question,” he said. “God sustains all things — both the things themselves, and the processes therein.”
Next, the day’s conversation turned to the physical sciences. In his lecture, “Faith and the New Cosmology,” physicist Gerald Cleaver spanned topics ranging from ancient paradigms of creation, to cosmology, string theory and the possibility of multiple universes or “multiverses.” Human knowledge of the universe’s fundamental features has skyrocketed over the past century, Cleaver noted, but knowledge doesn’t equate to understanding.
“Science asks and tries to answer the ‘how’ questions,” Cleaver said. “Transcendent revelation addresses the ‘why’ through Scripture and faith.”
In her lecture, “Does Life Have A History?” Phyllis Tippit used plate tectonics as an illustration of purposeful, constant change in the physical world.
As geologic collision recycles carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, plate tectonics is “part of a system that makes this world a place to live,” Tippit observed.
Using an analogy of God as gardener, Tippit presented her thesis that the theory of evolution supports — rather than contradicts — God’s presence in the universe. Evolution, she said, is simply “organized change through time.”
“We have a God who works, who shapes … constantly working with his creation. Isn’t that kind of what we see when we look at evolution?” Tippet said.
Roger Paynter, the church's pastor, hoped the seminar's frank discussion offered hope for attention to a long-ignored need in churches. Many members of his congregation have been hurt by being told they couldn’t pursue both faith and science, he said.
“I think people are hungry to be treated as if they have a brain,” Paynter said. “It doesn’t threaten our faith, it deepens our faith.”
The seminar wasn’t a one-time event. Through Baylor’s sponsorship, Schmeltekopf hopes to develop it into a series presented in several churches throughout Texas.
His main hurdle will be finding churches receptive to these discussions, he noted.
“There are lots of Baptist churches for which the subject would be too controversial,” he said.
But Schmeltekopf insists the relationship between science and faith is a pertinent and necessary issue for Baptists to consider.
“The church’s witness to the world needs to include our conversation with the scientific community, and not ignore it,” he urged. “We are negligent to ignore this aspect of life. It’s just irresponsible.”
During group discussions prior to the lectures, participants listed major “pressure points” they considered important to the day’s conversation. Some wanted to develop a “common language” and a “framework for conversation” between the disciplines. Others wondered how to hold to a belief in biblical inerrancy while recognizing scientific support for alternate interpretations of the text.
Teachers face special circumstances, many participants noted — because they answer not only to peers, but also to parents and administrators for how they approach topics like evolution in the classroom.
In a panel discussion at the end of the seminar, Harvey offered advice for tempering antagonism over questions of faith and science.
“We should care what the other person thinks. We should struggle together to find the truth,” Harvey said.
Tippit suggested participants begin conversations in their own congregations by starting book clubs featuring literature that raises controversial — but important — issues in faith and science.
At First Baptist, Paynter promotes having these discussions in Sunday school, in an “environment of permission for people to ask the tough questions, and not have simplistic answers.”
“It takes tremendous grace to be in dialogue,” he said. “You have to be willing to disagree, to learn.”
The next seminar in this series will be held at Wilshire Baptist Church in Dallas on April 10.
-30-
Carrie Joynton is a freelance writer in San Antonio and a former Texas Baptist communications intern.