Baptist News Global
Sections
  • News
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Curated
  • Storytelling
    • Faith & Justice >
      • Charleston: Metanoia with Bill Stanfield
      • Charlotte: QC Family Tree with Greg and Helms Jarrell
      • Little Rock: Judge Wendell Griffen
      • North Carolina: Conetoe
    • Welcoming the Stranger >
      • Lost Boys of Sudan: St. John’s Baptist Charlotte
      • Awakening to Immigrant Justice: Myers Park Baptist Church
      • Hospitality on the corner: Gaston Christian Center
    • Signature Ministries >
      • Jake Hall: Gospel Gothic, Music and Radio
    • Singing Our Faith >
      • Hymns for a Lifetime: Ken Wilson and Knollwood Baptist Church
      • Norfolk Street Choir
    • Resilient Rural America >
      • Alabama: Perry County
      • Texas: Hidalgo County
      • Arkansas Delta
      • Southeast Kentucky
  • More
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donate
    • Planned Giving
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Advertising
    • Ministry Jobs and More
    • Transitions
    • Subscribe
    • Submissions and Permissions
Donate Subscribe
Search Search this site

The Supreme Court term: Something for everyone to love and hate

Faith Freedom 2020David Gushee, Senior Columnist  |  July 16, 2020

The Supreme Court’s major rulings this June and early July may collectively be remembered as one of the most constructive political developments of this momentous and terrible year.

David GusheeThe court’s decisions this term gave important wins and losses to both liberals and conservatives, were voted on by surprising alliances of judges, and were rarely resolved by 5-4 bloc voting. (One brand-new exception was the awful 5-4 vote to allow a federal execution to go forward in the wee hours of Tuesday morning, July 14.) They also set limits on President Trump’s claims of power while not positioning the judicial branch to decide the November presidential election.

Taken together, the court’s body of work during its regular term helped hold our fragile democracy together during a time of high social stress. That is no small achievement.

For almost 50 years, amid the bitter conflicts of a culture in profound religious and moral transition, the Supreme Court has evolved to become the decision-maker of last resort on the most controversial moral-political issues facing our desperately divided country: abortion, sexuality, church/state relations, race, immigration, contraception and so on.

Tom Alexander holds a cross as he prays prior to rulings outside the Supreme Court on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, July 8, 2020. (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky)

Through nine presidencies, the United States has descended into a deadlocked, morally divided, red/blue society. Congress (especially when controlled by opposite parties) has proved ineffectual in offering legislative solutions. Presidents have turned more and more to executive orders easily overturned at the next election. Mass media has become balkanized.

In this context, finding even semi-permanent, regular-order policy solutions to basic governance problems often has ended up in the hands of the judiciary and especially the Supreme Court. This has been quite a burden for the court to bear, and such a circumstance could hardly have been imagined by the American Founders.

By now the Supreme Court itself has become symbolic both of our national fragility and, at times, of what hope might remain for our democratic survival. Nine very different judges, appointed through a highly charged political process, increasingly expected to be the bearers of victory for our side (you know: the right side, the virtuous side, the just side), must sit in a room together all year long and talk to each other. Then they must finally resolve their major cases in such a way that both American sides feel that they were treated fairly overall — and that both still have a stake in America.

“The Supreme Court itself has become symbolic … of our national fragility.”

Indeed, it has come down to nothing less than that. The most ardent ideological warriors on both sides fear that their country is at risk of becoming enemy territory, where our side is not at home, our basic values are threatened with extinction. Sometimes it seems that with each Supreme Court term, the question of whether two disparate groups of 50 million Americans will believe themselves to still belong here is up for grabs. If the court were to fail repeatedly and visibly in offering hope to the partisans of either side, it could be the final spark leading to mass emigration, violence or even civil war. I do not believe I am exaggerating.

This may be a good time to note that as of 2020 American religion offers little help in knitting our fragile nation together across its culture-wars divisions. As most readers will know, we see Red Religion and Blue Religion around us every day. Christianity as such does not seem to exist anymore. Instead, we have Red and Blue Christianities. In this sense, one of the most significant political contributions of our churches occurs precisely when we hold red and blue peaceably together in purple congregations.

From the beginning, at least for his opponents, the potential presidency of Donald Trump raised the risks of pushing our red/blue divisions to the breaking point, including through his approach to the Supreme Court. While running for president, Trump promised to appoint true-red, conservative-approved jurists off a list outsourced to the Federalist Society. He raised the hope of conservatives that he could essentially guarantee them their cherished policy wins.

Trump may not have known that much about politics in 2015, but he did know this: religious (and other) conservatives would swallow an awful lot if he would deliver them their preferred judges. There was reason to expect lockstep 5-4 conservative wins, on everything, after the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh in 2018.

Of course, Democratic presidential candidates also have made and delivered upon specific promises about what kind of Supreme Court justices they would appoint. They usually have been a bit more subtle about it.

Once it became likely that the Supreme Court was ultimately going to have to rule on actions and litigation involving Trump himself, the stakes became that much higher. Trump’s opponents had every reason to wonder whether a firmly conservative-majority Supreme Court would be willing to cross the president in cases involving himself. And challenges to the rule of law, the integrity of the Department of Justice, and the independence of the judiciary overall have deepened since William Barr began his distressing run as attorney general.

So now it’s the 2019-2020 term, and you are Chief Justice John Roberts. How do you handle this year’s cases? You might conclude that it is important to position the court as neither partisan nor supine before executive power. You might want to offer some decisions that go to the left and others to the right. You might want as few 5-4 votes as possible. You might want unpredictable people writing certain decisions and unpredictable voting alliances whenever possible.

And you might want to signal that the court will be unintimidated on decisions involving the president himself.

Now, of course, I have no idea if Chief Justice Roberts or any other justices were thinking in those terms this year. But I am quite sure that the work that they offered conforms almost exactly to the pattern I just suggested.

A quick review:

Religious conservatives won three church-state cases. Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania and Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru were decided on surprisingly robust 7-2 votes, in which liberal judges Elena Kagan and Stephen Breyer crossed over. Conservatives also won Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue, on a more predictable 5-4 vote. The first case will help to cement federally guaranteed opt-out rights based on religious and moral convictions; the second interprets the First Amendment’s religion clauses as restraining state involvement in religious-institution hiring practices, and the third case advances access to state funding for private-religious-schools on the same basis as private secular schools.

These were big wins for religious conservatives. Bracketing discussion of their legal merits, these decisions should help religious conservatives feel that at the Supreme Court they can sometimes find safe harbor.

On the other hand, social-justice liberals can be said to have won on four fronts. Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California has for now protected Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals recipients from deportation. Three cases involving gay and transgender rights were decided to establish a historic national ban on LGBTQ employment discrimination based on the 1964 Civil Rights Act (with the decision written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, appointed by Donald Trump).  June Medical Services v. Russo ruled Louisiana’s highly restrictive abortion law just as unconstitutional as the Texas statute which it imitated. McGirt v. Oklahoma ruled that about half the state of Oklahoma belongs to the Creek Nation (with Justice Gorsuch again siding with the court’s liberal bloc). Conservative justices Roberts and Gorsuch crossing over on some of these cases is just as important as their content.

Finally, on the last day of its term, the Court dealt with two Trump cases (Trump v. Mazars and Trump v. Vance). In complex 7-2 votes (including Roberts, Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh siding with the four liberal justices) the court established the principle that the president is not above the law at either the state or federal level, while ruling more favorably on the New York State case against the president than on the claims from the Democratic House of Representatives. Still, in both cases, further legal action seems likely to be delayed until after the November election. These were positively Solomonic outcomes.

The election is coming in less than four months. Partisans will still point to Supreme Court appointees as among the main reasons to vote for their guy for president. But the idea that the court is not just a partisan tool, that it operates according to the rule of law, and that specific Supreme Court justices will think independently, survives.

In a year full of sheer awfulness, this is rare good news, indeed.

David P. Gushee is Distinguished University Professor of Christian Ethics and Director of the Center for Theology and Public Life at Mercer University. He is the past president of both the American Academy of Religion and Society of Christian Ethics. He is an author or editor of 25 books. His most recognized works include Righteous Gentiles of the Holocaust, Kingdom Ethics, The Sacredness of Human Life, and Changing Our Mind. He earned the Ph.D. from Union Seminary. He and his wife, Jeanie, live in Atlanta.

Tags:social justiceDavid GusheeSupreme CourtReligious Right
More by
David Gushee, Senior Columnist
  • Get BNG headlines in your inbox

  • Featured

    • The Black community needs allies who listen and act, scholar says

      News

    • When a Mexican cartel kidnapped a Baptist pastor, they got more than they bargained for

      News

    • Women of childbearing age are least likely to see strict abortion laws as best deterrent against abortion

      News

    • Progress on sexual abuse in the SBC? Not so fast

      Opinion


    Curated

    • Pope orders online release of WWII-era Pius XII Jewish files

      Pope orders online release of WWII-era Pius XII Jewish files

      June 24, 2022
    • Demolishing schools after a mass shooting reflects humans’ deep-rooted desire for purification rituals

      Demolishing schools after a mass shooting reflects humans’ deep-rooted desire for purification rituals

      June 24, 2022
    • Has American conservatism abandoned the Christian right?

      Has American conservatism abandoned the Christian right?

      June 24, 2022
    • In Colorado, a GOP rarity: An abortion rights candidate

      In Colorado, a GOP rarity: An abortion rights candidate

      June 24, 2022
    Read Next:

    Maybe seminaries should offer a class in mergers and acquisitions

    AnalysisMark Wingfield

    More Articles

    • All
    • News
    • Opinion
    • Curated
    • Here’s what pastors said this Sunday in churches not celebrating the Supreme Court’s abortion decision

      NewsMark Wingfield

    • The French Dreyfus Affair and Trump’s Big Lie

      OpinionDavid Gushee, Senior Columnist

    • Women of childbearing age are least likely to see strict abortion laws as best deterrent against abortion

      NewsMark Wingfield

    • Independence Day: Not to celebrate but to reflect

      OpinionKathy Manis Findley

    • U.S. State Department calls out Russia, China, Afghanistan, Myanmar for extreme religious freedom abuses

      NewsJeff Brumley

    • Two viruses threaten the life of the Southern Baptist Convention: Male hierarchy and dominion theology

      AnalysisEllis Orozco

    • Progress on sexual abuse in the SBC? Not so fast

      OpinionDavid Clohessy and Christa Brown

    • Pranoto, Shaw, Smith and Younger join BNG board of directors

      NewsBNG staff

    • Uyghur American elected chairman of U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom

      NewsMark Wingfield

    • When a Mexican cartel kidnapped a Baptist pastor, they got more than they bargained for

      NewsJeff Brumley

    • The Black community needs allies who listen and act, scholar says

      NewsPat Cole

    • Maybe seminaries should offer a class in mergers and acquisitions

      AnalysisMark Wingfield

    • Reflections on my mother’s funeral: The heart has reasons

      OpinionDavid Ramsey

    • Georgia Baptists hit snag on sale of 16-year-old headquarters property in suburban Atlanta

      NewsMark Wingfield

    • When ‘orthodoxy’ won’t hold: The SBC and the rest of us

      OpinionBill Leonard, Senior Columnist

    • At Faith and Freedom conference, evangelical Christian voters once again abandon their concern for marital fidelity

      NewsMark Wingfield

    • Annual report on Baptist women in ministry finds some gains but serious losses due to COVID

      NewsJeff Brumley

    • Seven suggestions for preventing conflict before it happens

      OpinionBill Wilson

    • Church-state separationists join Justice Sotomayor in blasting the Supreme Court’s ruling in a Maine school voucher case

      NewsMark Wingfield

    • The gospel according to mammals

      OpinionTyler Tankersley

    • Conservative clergywoman claims United Methodist system unjust

      NewsCynthia Astle

    • How God used Jay Bakker to teach me about race and loving all people

      OpinionMaina Mwaura

    • In Africa, inflation and a food crisis threaten not just the economy but people’s lives

      NewsAnthony Akaeze

    • When a teenager gets kicked to the curb by Christian parents

      OpinionDan McGee and Linda Francis Cross

    • American support for abortion rights at highest level since 1995, Gallup says

      NewsJeff Brumley

    • Here’s what pastors said this Sunday in churches not celebrating the Supreme Court’s abortion decision

      NewsMark Wingfield

    • Women of childbearing age are least likely to see strict abortion laws as best deterrent against abortion

      NewsMark Wingfield

    • U.S. State Department calls out Russia, China, Afghanistan, Myanmar for extreme religious freedom abuses

      NewsJeff Brumley

    • Pranoto, Shaw, Smith and Younger join BNG board of directors

      NewsBNG staff

    • Uyghur American elected chairman of U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom

      NewsMark Wingfield

    • When a Mexican cartel kidnapped a Baptist pastor, they got more than they bargained for

      NewsJeff Brumley

    • The Black community needs allies who listen and act, scholar says

      NewsPat Cole

    • Georgia Baptists hit snag on sale of 16-year-old headquarters property in suburban Atlanta

      NewsMark Wingfield

    • At Faith and Freedom conference, evangelical Christian voters once again abandon their concern for marital fidelity

      NewsMark Wingfield

    • Annual report on Baptist women in ministry finds some gains but serious losses due to COVID

      NewsJeff Brumley

    • Church-state separationists join Justice Sotomayor in blasting the Supreme Court’s ruling in a Maine school voucher case

      NewsMark Wingfield

    • Conservative clergywoman claims United Methodist system unjust

      NewsCynthia Astle

    • In Africa, inflation and a food crisis threaten not just the economy but people’s lives

      NewsAnthony Akaeze

    • American support for abortion rights at highest level since 1995, Gallup says

      NewsJeff Brumley

    • Ministry jobs and more

      NewsBarbara Francis

    • New platform of Texas GOP is laced with Christian privilege

      NewsMark Wingfield

    • Author explores contradiction of evangelical support for prison ministry and tough-on-crime laws at same time

      NewsJeff Brumley

    • One year later, awareness of Juneteenth is growing

      NewsMark Wingfield

    • Churches in Russian-occupied sections of Ukraine face desperate conditions

      NewsJeff Brumley

    • Transitions for the week of 6-17-22

      NewsBarbara Francis

    • Many voices call for prosecution of mob who lynched and burned Christian student in Nigeria

      NewsAnthony Akaeze

    • Religious Liberty Council elects two BJC board members

      NewsJeff Brumley

    • Still no external review of North American Mission Board finances

      NewsMark Wingfield

    • Attempt to dismantle SBC Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission fails

      NewsMark Wingfield

    • Brian Foreman named CBF’s coordinator of congregational ministries

      NewsBNG staff

    • The French Dreyfus Affair and Trump’s Big Lie

      OpinionDavid Gushee, Senior Columnist

    • Independence Day: Not to celebrate but to reflect

      OpinionKathy Manis Findley

    • Progress on sexual abuse in the SBC? Not so fast

      OpinionDavid Clohessy and Christa Brown

    • Reflections on my mother’s funeral: The heart has reasons

      OpinionDavid Ramsey

    • When ‘orthodoxy’ won’t hold: The SBC and the rest of us

      OpinionBill Leonard, Senior Columnist

    • Seven suggestions for preventing conflict before it happens

      OpinionBill Wilson

    • The gospel according to mammals

      OpinionTyler Tankersley

    • How God used Jay Bakker to teach me about race and loving all people

      OpinionMaina Mwaura

    • When a teenager gets kicked to the curb by Christian parents

      OpinionDan McGee and Linda Francis Cross

    • Unzipped: How (not) to commute

      OpinionEric Minton

    • When it comes to leading corporate prayer, are we really all in this together?

      OpinionMark Wingfield

    • Is America racist at heart?

      OpinionEugene G. Akins III

    • Note to self: Get rid of resting jerkface

      OpinionErich Bridges

    • Don’t keep sweet: Why white Christians need to celebrate Juneteenth

      OpinionErica Whitaker

    • Letter to the Editor: The importance of establishing best practices for pastoral searches

      OpinionLetters to the Editor

    • Hymn Stories: ‘Will You Come and Follow Me’

      OpinionBeverly A. Howard

    • A Bubba-Doo’s regular loses a loved one

      OpinionCharles Qualls

    • The oxymoron of being both anti-abortion and pro-gun

      OpinionEarl Chappell

    • My trip to the seamy world of horseracing

      OpinionBrett Younger

    • In the news this weekend: This is what it means to take God’s name in vain

      OpinionErin Albin Hill

    • Sympathy does not defeat white supremacy

      OpinionWendell Griffen

    • What Kenobi has taught me about God

      OpinionRob Lee

    • Is ‘fascism’ the right name for the Trumpist hard right in America?

      OpinionDavid Gushee, Senior Columnist

    • God in three persons, blessed Trinity

      OpinionBarry Howard

    • Bill Self in 1984: ‘Babylonian Captivity of the Convention’

      OpinionBill Self

    • Pope orders online release of WWII-era Pius XII Jewish files

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Demolishing schools after a mass shooting reflects humans’ deep-rooted desire for purification rituals

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Has American conservatism abandoned the Christian right?

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • In Colorado, a GOP rarity: An abortion rights candidate

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • A church was ordered to rescind its gay deacon. Now it weighs its next step.

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Can the Church Still Enact Justice When a Pastor Sues His Accusers?

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Republican Lauren Boebert jokes about AR-15s and Jesus — and yes, she’s a ‘real’ Christian

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • This World Refugee Day, rising white nationalism meets the largest refugee population in history — which is no coincidence

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • How evangelical Christians are sizing up the 2024 GOP race for president

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Abortion bill, confederate holiday removal signed by Edwards

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Buddhist leader in Bhutan fully ordains 144 women, resuming ancient tradition

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Banning Nancy Pelosi from Communion May Have Backfired

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • How Franklin Graham pushed a domestic abuse victim to return to her husband

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Poor People’s Campaign holds major DC rally to combat poverty

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • An Elite Christian College Has Become The Latest Battleground In America’s Culture Wars

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Wiccan celebration of summer solstice is a reminder that change, as expressed in nature, is inevitable

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Camino pilgrims help rural Spain’s emptying villages survive

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • What Antisemitism Looks Like When It Is Carved into Church

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Humanist chaplains guide nonreligious students on quest for meaning

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • On Juneteenth, Jewish communities are reckoning with their own attitudes on race

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • UK sanctions Russian Orthodox head; decries forced adoption

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • California again seeks to pass human composting bill as Catholic bishops oppose it

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Boise police can’t charge pastor who said LGBTQ people are ‘worthy of death’

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Ukrainian archbishop pushes against papal statements, says causes of war ‘lie within Russia itself’

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Bishop punishes school over Black Lives Matter, Pride flags

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    Conversations that Matter.

    © 2022 Baptist News Global. All rights reserved.

    Want to share a story? We hope you will! Read our republishing, terms of use and privacy policies here.

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • LinkedIn
    • RSS