Baptist News Global
Sections
  • News
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Curated
  • Storytelling
    • Faith & Justice >
      • Charleston: Metanoia with Bill Stanfield
      • Charlotte: QC Family Tree with Greg and Helms Jarrell
      • Little Rock: Judge Wendell Griffen
      • North Carolina: Conetoe
    • Welcoming the Stranger >
      • Lost Boys of Sudan: St. John’s Baptist Charlotte
      • Awakening to Immigrant Justice: Myers Park Baptist Church
      • Hospitality on the corner: Gaston Christian Center
    • Signature Ministries >
      • Jake Hall: Gospel Gothic, Music and Radio
    • Singing Our Faith >
      • Hymns for a Lifetime: Ken Wilson and Knollwood Baptist Church
      • Norfolk Street Choir
    • Resilient Rural America >
      • Alabama: Perry County
      • Texas: Hidalgo County
      • Arkansas Delta
      • Southeast Kentucky
  • More
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donate
    • Planned Giving
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Advertising
    • Ministry Jobs and More
    • Transitions
    • Subscribe
    • Submissions and Permissions
Support independent, faith-based journalism. Donate
Search Search this site

The Supreme Court term: Something for everyone to love and hate

Faith Freedom 2020David Gushee, Senior Columnist  |  July 16, 2020

The Supreme Court’s major rulings this June and early July may collectively be remembered as one of the most constructive political developments of this momentous and terrible year.

David GusheeThe court’s decisions this term gave important wins and losses to both liberals and conservatives, were voted on by surprising alliances of judges, and were rarely resolved by 5-4 bloc voting. (One brand-new exception was the awful 5-4 vote to allow a federal execution to go forward in the wee hours of Tuesday morning, July 14.) They also set limits on President Trump’s claims of power while not positioning the judicial branch to decide the November presidential election.

Taken together, the court’s body of work during its regular term helped hold our fragile democracy together during a time of high social stress. That is no small achievement.

For almost 50 years, amid the bitter conflicts of a culture in profound religious and moral transition, the Supreme Court has evolved to become the decision-maker of last resort on the most controversial moral-political issues facing our desperately divided country: abortion, sexuality, church/state relations, race, immigration, contraception and so on.

Tom Alexander holds a cross as he prays prior to rulings outside the Supreme Court on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, July 8, 2020. (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky)

Through nine presidencies, the United States has descended into a deadlocked, morally divided, red/blue society. Congress (especially when controlled by opposite parties) has proved ineffectual in offering legislative solutions. Presidents have turned more and more to executive orders easily overturned at the next election. Mass media has become balkanized.

In this context, finding even semi-permanent, regular-order policy solutions to basic governance problems often has ended up in the hands of the judiciary and especially the Supreme Court. This has been quite a burden for the court to bear, and such a circumstance could hardly have been imagined by the American Founders.

By now the Supreme Court itself has become symbolic both of our national fragility and, at times, of what hope might remain for our democratic survival. Nine very different judges, appointed through a highly charged political process, increasingly expected to be the bearers of victory for our side (you know: the right side, the virtuous side, the just side), must sit in a room together all year long and talk to each other. Then they must finally resolve their major cases in such a way that both American sides feel that they were treated fairly overall — and that both still have a stake in America.

“The Supreme Court itself has become symbolic … of our national fragility.”

Indeed, it has come down to nothing less than that. The most ardent ideological warriors on both sides fear that their country is at risk of becoming enemy territory, where our side is not at home, our basic values are threatened with extinction. Sometimes it seems that with each Supreme Court term, the question of whether two disparate groups of 50 million Americans will believe themselves to still belong here is up for grabs. If the court were to fail repeatedly and visibly in offering hope to the partisans of either side, it could be the final spark leading to mass emigration, violence or even civil war. I do not believe I am exaggerating.

This may be a good time to note that as of 2020 American religion offers little help in knitting our fragile nation together across its culture-wars divisions. As most readers will know, we see Red Religion and Blue Religion around us every day. Christianity as such does not seem to exist anymore. Instead, we have Red and Blue Christianities. In this sense, one of the most significant political contributions of our churches occurs precisely when we hold red and blue peaceably together in purple congregations.

From the beginning, at least for his opponents, the potential presidency of Donald Trump raised the risks of pushing our red/blue divisions to the breaking point, including through his approach to the Supreme Court. While running for president, Trump promised to appoint true-red, conservative-approved jurists off a list outsourced to the Federalist Society. He raised the hope of conservatives that he could essentially guarantee them their cherished policy wins.

Trump may not have known that much about politics in 2015, but he did know this: religious (and other) conservatives would swallow an awful lot if he would deliver them their preferred judges. There was reason to expect lockstep 5-4 conservative wins, on everything, after the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh in 2018.

Of course, Democratic presidential candidates also have made and delivered upon specific promises about what kind of Supreme Court justices they would appoint. They usually have been a bit more subtle about it.

Once it became likely that the Supreme Court was ultimately going to have to rule on actions and litigation involving Trump himself, the stakes became that much higher. Trump’s opponents had every reason to wonder whether a firmly conservative-majority Supreme Court would be willing to cross the president in cases involving himself. And challenges to the rule of law, the integrity of the Department of Justice, and the independence of the judiciary overall have deepened since William Barr began his distressing run as attorney general.

So now it’s the 2019-2020 term, and you are Chief Justice John Roberts. How do you handle this year’s cases? You might conclude that it is important to position the court as neither partisan nor supine before executive power. You might want to offer some decisions that go to the left and others to the right. You might want as few 5-4 votes as possible. You might want unpredictable people writing certain decisions and unpredictable voting alliances whenever possible.

And you might want to signal that the court will be unintimidated on decisions involving the president himself.

Now, of course, I have no idea if Chief Justice Roberts or any other justices were thinking in those terms this year. But I am quite sure that the work that they offered conforms almost exactly to the pattern I just suggested.

A quick review:

Religious conservatives won three church-state cases. Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania and Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru were decided on surprisingly robust 7-2 votes, in which liberal judges Elena Kagan and Stephen Breyer crossed over. Conservatives also won Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue, on a more predictable 5-4 vote. The first case will help to cement federally guaranteed opt-out rights based on religious and moral convictions; the second interprets the First Amendment’s religion clauses as restraining state involvement in religious-institution hiring practices, and the third case advances access to state funding for private-religious-schools on the same basis as private secular schools.

These were big wins for religious conservatives. Bracketing discussion of their legal merits, these decisions should help religious conservatives feel that at the Supreme Court they can sometimes find safe harbor.

On the other hand, social-justice liberals can be said to have won on four fronts. Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California has for now protected Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals recipients from deportation. Three cases involving gay and transgender rights were decided to establish a historic national ban on LGBTQ employment discrimination based on the 1964 Civil Rights Act (with the decision written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, appointed by Donald Trump).  June Medical Services v. Russo ruled Louisiana’s highly restrictive abortion law just as unconstitutional as the Texas statute which it imitated. McGirt v. Oklahoma ruled that about half the state of Oklahoma belongs to the Creek Nation (with Justice Gorsuch again siding with the court’s liberal bloc). Conservative justices Roberts and Gorsuch crossing over on some of these cases is just as important as their content.

Finally, on the last day of its term, the Court dealt with two Trump cases (Trump v. Mazars and Trump v. Vance). In complex 7-2 votes (including Roberts, Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh siding with the four liberal justices) the court established the principle that the president is not above the law at either the state or federal level, while ruling more favorably on the New York State case against the president than on the claims from the Democratic House of Representatives. Still, in both cases, further legal action seems likely to be delayed until after the November election. These were positively Solomonic outcomes.

The election is coming in less than four months. Partisans will still point to Supreme Court appointees as among the main reasons to vote for their guy for president. But the idea that the court is not just a partisan tool, that it operates according to the rule of law, and that specific Supreme Court justices will think independently, survives.

In a year full of sheer awfulness, this is rare good news, indeed.

David P. Gushee is Distinguished University Professor of Christian Ethics and Director of the Center for Theology and Public Life at Mercer University. He is the past president of both the American Academy of Religion and Society of Christian Ethics. He is an author or editor of 25 books. His most recognized works include Righteous Gentiles of the Holocaust, Kingdom Ethics, The Sacredness of Human Life, and Changing Our Mind. He earned the Ph.D. from Union Seminary. He and his wife, Jeanie, live in Atlanta.

Tags:social justiceDavid GusheeSupreme CourtReligious Right
David Gushee, Senior Columnist
More by
David Gushee, Senior Columnist
  • Get BNG headlines in your inbox

  • Featured

    • The strange saga of the Riley Foundation lawsuit now forces SBC to figure out who has the right to remove a seminary trustee

      News

    • Black History Month: Remembering, waiting, watching

      Opinion

    • LGBTQ inclusion and clergy sexual abuse treated equally in SBC expulsions

      News

    • About disfellowshipping churches based on the ‘clear’ teaching of Scripture

      Opinion


    Curated

    • Texas church helps mosque damaged after snowstorm

      Texas church helps mosque damaged after snowstorm

      February 26, 2021
    • Vaccinated for virus, Jimmy Carter and wife back in church

      Vaccinated for virus, Jimmy Carter and wife back in church

      February 26, 2021
    • Black Church Group Offers Its Best Shot at Closing Vaccine Gap

      Black Church Group Offers Its Best Shot at Closing Vaccine Gap

      February 26, 2021
    • Man who played Duke Chapel bells for 50 years dies

      Man who played Duke Chapel bells for 50 years dies

      February 26, 2021
    Read Next:

    Free Lenten daily devotionals offered

    NewsBNG staff

    More Articles

    • All
    • News
    • Opinion
    • Curated
    • Matter-of-fact statements about Scripture aren’t always the gospel truth

      OpinionJordan Conley

    • Some Methodist churches finding greater mission results with simplified governance

      NewsCynthia Astle

    • Black History Month: Remembering, waiting, watching

      OpinionWendell Griffen

    • Diverse religious coalition urges Congress to finalize the Equal Rights Amendment

      NewsJeff Brumley

    • Canada labels Uyghur repression ‘genocide,’ but that’s not as exemplary as you might think

      OpinionRay Mwareya

    • She’s Gen-Z, became leery of the church but practices faith with fitness

      NewsJeff Brumley

    • About disfellowshipping churches based on the ‘clear’ teaching of Scripture

      OpinionDalen Jackson

    • What the SBC should learn from the Ravi Zacharias tragedy

      OpinionChrista Brown

    • LGBTQ inclusion and clergy sexual abuse treated equally in SBC expulsions

      NewsMark Wingfield

    • The Black church and the salvation of the world

      OpinionPaul Robeson Ford

    • The two Georges, the world and American leadership

      AnalysisErich Bridges

    • As people walk away from the church in droves, Russ Dean hopes to tell the old story in a new way

      NewsJeff Brumley

    • The strange saga of the Riley Foundation lawsuit now forces SBC to figure out who has the right to remove a seminary trustee

      NewsMark Wingfield

    • St. Benedict and a two-fold path for the church In America

      OpinionH. Stephen Shoemaker

    • What if we cared about Black History Month as much as Lent?

      OpinionRick Pidcock

    • In-person worship dropped in January as more churches were directly affected by COVID

      NewsJeff Brumley

    • Prophecy is obedient imagination

      OpinionAlan Bean

    • Caldwell succeeds Anderson as chair of BNG board

      NewsBNG staff

    • Ministry jobs and more

      NewsBarbara Francis

    • Final vote sounds the death knell for capital punishment in Virginia

      NewsJeff Brumley

    • Reeves to lead Fellowship Southwest

      NewsMark Wingfield

    • Three years later, Leah Sharibu is still held captive, reportedly for refusing to renounce her faith

      NewsAnthony Akaeze

    • How much wealth does America need before we’ll address homelessness?

      OpinionMichael Chancellor

    • Wake Forest Divinity gets $5 million grant to help combat HIV/AIDS

      NewsMark Wingfield

    • Why we need to talk about abortion

      OpinionRuss Dean

    • Some Methodist churches finding greater mission results with simplified governance

      NewsCynthia Astle

    • Diverse religious coalition urges Congress to finalize the Equal Rights Amendment

      NewsJeff Brumley

    • She’s Gen-Z, became leery of the church but practices faith with fitness

      NewsJeff Brumley

    • LGBTQ inclusion and clergy sexual abuse treated equally in SBC expulsions

      NewsMark Wingfield

    • As people walk away from the church in droves, Russ Dean hopes to tell the old story in a new way

      NewsJeff Brumley

    • The strange saga of the Riley Foundation lawsuit now forces SBC to figure out who has the right to remove a seminary trustee

      NewsMark Wingfield

    • In-person worship dropped in January as more churches were directly affected by COVID

      NewsJeff Brumley

    • Caldwell succeeds Anderson as chair of BNG board

      NewsBNG staff

    • Ministry jobs and more

      NewsBarbara Francis

    • Final vote sounds the death knell for capital punishment in Virginia

      NewsJeff Brumley

    • Reeves to lead Fellowship Southwest

      NewsMark Wingfield

    • Three years later, Leah Sharibu is still held captive, reportedly for refusing to renounce her faith

      NewsAnthony Akaeze

    • Wake Forest Divinity gets $5 million grant to help combat HIV/AIDS

      NewsMark Wingfield

    • Making the case for why Black History Month is necessary

      NewsJeff Brumley

    • Baylor regents ‘accept’ racial history report, will release findings by end of March

      NewsMark Wingfield

    • Pay attention to what’s happening in Myanmar, Baptist pastors plead

      NewsJeff Brumley

    • Transitions for the week of 2-19-21

      NewsBarbara Francis

    • With Invictus Howard Goodall tells Christ’s Passion mainly through texts written by women

      NewsMark Wingfield

    • On religious liberty views and other issues, there’s still a wide gap between evangelicals and the rest of America

      NewsJeff Brumley

    • Kyle Tubbs to lead CBF Oklahoma

      NewsBNG staff

    • Church leadership series offers help finding resilience required to navigate change

      NewsJeff Brumley

    • Ministry jobs and more

      NewsBarbara Francis

    • At Baptist college in Virginia, a disagreement over athletes kneeling during National Anthem

      NewsJeff Brumley

    • In Kenya, Sodzo International keeps children off the streets   

      NewsAnthony Akaeze

    • How do you say hello to a new congregation when you can’t meet them in person?

      NewsCynthia Astle

    • Matter-of-fact statements about Scripture aren’t always the gospel truth

      OpinionJordan Conley

    • Black History Month: Remembering, waiting, watching

      OpinionWendell Griffen

    • Canada labels Uyghur repression ‘genocide,’ but that’s not as exemplary as you might think

      OpinionRay Mwareya

    • About disfellowshipping churches based on the ‘clear’ teaching of Scripture

      OpinionDalen Jackson

    • What the SBC should learn from the Ravi Zacharias tragedy

      OpinionChrista Brown

    • The Black church and the salvation of the world

      OpinionPaul Robeson Ford

    • St. Benedict and a two-fold path for the church In America

      OpinionH. Stephen Shoemaker

    • What if we cared about Black History Month as much as Lent?

      OpinionRick Pidcock

    • Prophecy is obedient imagination

      OpinionAlan Bean

    • How much wealth does America need before we’ll address homelessness?

      OpinionMichael Chancellor

    • Why we need to talk about abortion

      OpinionRuss Dean

    • How travel and food break through barriers that divide us

      OpinionPhawnda Moore

    • Is the church only for ‘good Christians’?

      OpinionTerry Austin

    • Raging at God after my 67-year-old father died of COVID

      OpinionCarol McEntyre

    • Why I wrote about hope in disarray

      OpinionGrace Ji-Sun Kim

    • ‘For fear of the Jews’: Confronting Christian anti-Semitism

      OpinionGreg Garrett, Senior Columnist

    • What do we do now? The blessing and curse of COVID to the church

      OpinionKeli Rugenstein

    • Loving my neighbor by being an ‘active bystander’

      OpinionBecky Ankeny

    • A lesson from Texas: Winterization of power stations and the Golden Rule

      OpinionJonathan Davis

    • ‘Hour of decision’? Evangelicalism in a post-church, post-Trump era

      OpinionBill Leonard, Senior Columnist

    • During Lent, I’m learning to walk with a limp

      OpinionChris Conley

    • This year, I need Lent

      OpinionKate Hanch

    • Religious communities can offer more to the coronavirus vaccination effort

      OpinionMichael Woolf

    • What Patrick Mahomes taught us

      OpinionRobert P. Sellers

    • Whatever happened to the white conservative American Christian Republican soul?

      OpinionDavid Gushee, Senior Columnist

    • Texas church helps mosque damaged after snowstorm

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Vaccinated for virus, Jimmy Carter and wife back in church

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Black Church Group Offers Its Best Shot at Closing Vaccine Gap

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Man who played Duke Chapel bells for 50 years dies

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Ravi Zacharias’s Denomination Revokes Ordination

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Disinformation Fuels A White Evangelical Movement. It Led 1 Virginia Pastor To Quit

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Southern Baptists divided over politics, race, LGBTQ policy

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Rush Limbaugh, who shaped conservative Christian politics on the radio, has died

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Dallas faith groups help shelter homeless Texans during deep freeze

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • SBU Trustees Reverse Some Tenure/Promotion Denials

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • U.S. Supreme Court sides with Alabama death row inmate, declines to lift stay of execution over state’s refusal to allow clergy in chamber

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Survey: Black Americans attend church and pray more often

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • How Christian Bookstores Survived 2020

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Celebrating Ash Wednesday in a pandemic? There’s an app for that

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • From ‘Lent-in-a-box’ to ‘ash n dash’

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • No execution: Courts side with inmate wanting pastor present

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • New Arkansas Law Exempts Churches from Pandemic Restrictions

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Survey: More than a quarter of white evangelicals believe core QAnon conspiracy theory

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Evangelical Colleges Consider the Future of Online Education After COVID-19

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Law firm details sexual misconduct by global ministry leader

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Nation’s first human-composting funeral home is now open in the state of Washington

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Texas gambling opponents ready for battle

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Leonardo’s ‘Last Supper’ reopens to public with short wait

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Faith and the COVID-19 vaccine: ‘I’m a member of a community with duties’

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    • Safety Net Programs Have Reduced U.S. Poverty, Disparities Remain

      Curated

      Exclude from home pageBNG staff

    Conversations that Matter.

    © 2021 Baptist News Global. All rights reserved.

    Want to share a story? We hope you will! Read our republishing, terms of use and privacy policies here.

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • LinkedIn
    • RSS